1 /*
2 * Bug in original tree: (real_v ? : x) had been treated as equivalent of
3 * (real_v == 0 ? real_v == 0 : x), which gives the wrong type (and no
4 * warning from the testcase below).
5 */
6 static int x;
7 static double y;
a(void)8 int a(void)
9 {
10 return ~(y ? : x); /* should warn */
11 }
12 /*
13 * check-name: Two-argument conditional expression types
14 *
15 * check-error-start
16 cond_expr.c:10:16: error: incompatible type for operation (~):
17 cond_expr.c:10:16: double
18 * check-error-end
19 */
20