//===- MergeICmps.cpp - Optimize chains of integer comparisons ------------===// // // The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure // // This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source // License. See LICENSE.TXT for details. // //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// // // This pass turns chains of integer comparisons into memcmp (the memcmp is // later typically inlined as a chain of efficient hardware comparisons). This // typically benefits c++ member or nonmember operator==(). // // The basic idea is to replace a larger chain of integer comparisons loaded // from contiguous memory locations into a smaller chain of such integer // comparisons. Benefits are double: // - There are less jumps, and therefore less opportunities for mispredictions // and I-cache misses. // - Code size is smaller, both because jumps are removed and because the // encoding of a 2*n byte compare is smaller than that of two n-byte // compares. //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// #include #include #include #include #include "llvm/Analysis/Loads.h" #include "llvm/Analysis/TargetLibraryInfo.h" #include "llvm/Analysis/TargetTransformInfo.h" #include "llvm/IR/Function.h" #include "llvm/IR/IRBuilder.h" #include "llvm/Pass.h" #include "llvm/Transforms/Scalar.h" #include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/BuildLibCalls.h" using namespace llvm; namespace { #define DEBUG_TYPE "mergeicmps" // A BCE atom. struct BCEAtom { BCEAtom() : GEP(nullptr), LoadI(nullptr), Offset() {} const Value *Base() const { return GEP ? GEP->getPointerOperand() : nullptr; } bool operator<(const BCEAtom &O) const { assert(Base() && "invalid atom"); assert(O.Base() && "invalid atom"); // Just ordering by (Base(), Offset) is sufficient. However because this // means that the ordering will depend on the addresses of the base // values, which are not reproducible from run to run. To guarantee // stability, we use the names of the values if they exist; we sort by: // (Base.getName(), Base(), Offset). const int NameCmp = Base()->getName().compare(O.Base()->getName()); if (NameCmp == 0) { if (Base() == O.Base()) { return Offset.slt(O.Offset); } return Base() < O.Base(); } return NameCmp < 0; } GetElementPtrInst *GEP; LoadInst *LoadI; APInt Offset; }; // If this value is a load from a constant offset w.r.t. a base address, and // there are no other users of the load or address, returns the base address and // the offset. BCEAtom visitICmpLoadOperand(Value *const Val) { BCEAtom Result; if (auto *const LoadI = dyn_cast(Val)) { LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "load\n"); if (LoadI->isUsedOutsideOfBlock(LoadI->getParent())) { LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "used outside of block\n"); return {}; } if (LoadI->isVolatile()) { LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "volatile\n"); return {}; } Value *const Addr = LoadI->getOperand(0); if (auto *const GEP = dyn_cast(Addr)) { LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "GEP\n"); if (LoadI->isUsedOutsideOfBlock(LoadI->getParent())) { LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "used outside of block\n"); return {}; } const auto &DL = GEP->getModule()->getDataLayout(); if (!isDereferenceablePointer(GEP, DL)) { LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "not dereferenceable\n"); // We need to make sure that we can do comparison in any order, so we // require memory to be unconditionnally dereferencable. return {}; } Result.Offset = APInt(DL.getPointerTypeSizeInBits(GEP->getType()), 0); if (GEP->accumulateConstantOffset(DL, Result.Offset)) { Result.GEP = GEP; Result.LoadI = LoadI; } } } return Result; } // A basic block with a comparison between two BCE atoms. // The block might do extra work besides the atom comparison, in which case // doesOtherWork() returns true. Under some conditions, the block can be // split into the atom comparison part and the "other work" part // (see canSplit()). // Note: the terminology is misleading: the comparison is symmetric, so there // is no real {l/r}hs. What we want though is to have the same base on the // left (resp. right), so that we can detect consecutive loads. To ensure this // we put the smallest atom on the left. class BCECmpBlock { public: BCECmpBlock() {} BCECmpBlock(BCEAtom L, BCEAtom R, int SizeBits) : Lhs_(L), Rhs_(R), SizeBits_(SizeBits) { if (Rhs_ < Lhs_) std::swap(Rhs_, Lhs_); } bool IsValid() const { return Lhs_.Base() != nullptr && Rhs_.Base() != nullptr; } // Assert the block is consistent: If valid, it should also have // non-null members besides Lhs_ and Rhs_. void AssertConsistent() const { if (IsValid()) { assert(BB); assert(CmpI); assert(BranchI); } } const BCEAtom &Lhs() const { return Lhs_; } const BCEAtom &Rhs() const { return Rhs_; } int SizeBits() const { return SizeBits_; } // Returns true if the block does other works besides comparison. bool doesOtherWork() const; // Returns true if the non-BCE-cmp instructions can be separated from BCE-cmp // instructions in the block. bool canSplit() const; // Return true if this all the relevant instructions in the BCE-cmp-block can // be sunk below this instruction. By doing this, we know we can separate the // BCE-cmp-block instructions from the non-BCE-cmp-block instructions in the // block. bool canSinkBCECmpInst(const Instruction *, DenseSet &) const; // We can separate the BCE-cmp-block instructions and the non-BCE-cmp-block // instructions. Split the old block and move all non-BCE-cmp-insts into the // new parent block. void split(BasicBlock *NewParent) const; // The basic block where this comparison happens. BasicBlock *BB = nullptr; // The ICMP for this comparison. ICmpInst *CmpI = nullptr; // The terminating branch. BranchInst *BranchI = nullptr; // The block requires splitting. bool RequireSplit = false; private: BCEAtom Lhs_; BCEAtom Rhs_; int SizeBits_ = 0; }; bool BCECmpBlock::canSinkBCECmpInst(const Instruction *Inst, DenseSet &BlockInsts) const { // If this instruction has side effects and its in middle of the BCE cmp block // instructions, then bail for now. // TODO: use alias analysis to tell whether there is real interference. if (Inst->mayHaveSideEffects()) return false; // Make sure this instruction does not use any of the BCE cmp block // instructions as operand. for (auto BI : BlockInsts) { if (is_contained(Inst->operands(), BI)) return false; } return true; } void BCECmpBlock::split(BasicBlock *NewParent) const { DenseSet BlockInsts( {Lhs_.GEP, Rhs_.GEP, Lhs_.LoadI, Rhs_.LoadI, CmpI, BranchI}); llvm::SmallVector OtherInsts; for (Instruction &Inst : *BB) { if (BlockInsts.count(&Inst)) continue; assert(canSinkBCECmpInst(&Inst, BlockInsts) && "Split unsplittable block"); // This is a non-BCE-cmp-block instruction. And it can be separated // from the BCE-cmp-block instruction. OtherInsts.push_back(&Inst); } // Do the actual spliting. for (Instruction *Inst : reverse(OtherInsts)) { Inst->moveBefore(&*NewParent->begin()); } } bool BCECmpBlock::canSplit() const { DenseSet BlockInsts( {Lhs_.GEP, Rhs_.GEP, Lhs_.LoadI, Rhs_.LoadI, CmpI, BranchI}); for (Instruction &Inst : *BB) { if (!BlockInsts.count(&Inst)) { if (!canSinkBCECmpInst(&Inst, BlockInsts)) return false; } } return true; } bool BCECmpBlock::doesOtherWork() const { AssertConsistent(); // All the instructions we care about in the BCE cmp block. DenseSet BlockInsts( {Lhs_.GEP, Rhs_.GEP, Lhs_.LoadI, Rhs_.LoadI, CmpI, BranchI}); // TODO(courbet): Can we allow some other things ? This is very conservative. // We might be able to get away with anything does not have any side // effects outside of the basic block. // Note: The GEPs and/or loads are not necessarily in the same block. for (const Instruction &Inst : *BB) { if (!BlockInsts.count(&Inst)) return true; } return false; } // Visit the given comparison. If this is a comparison between two valid // BCE atoms, returns the comparison. BCECmpBlock visitICmp(const ICmpInst *const CmpI, const ICmpInst::Predicate ExpectedPredicate) { // The comparison can only be used once: // - For intermediate blocks, as a branch condition. // - For the final block, as an incoming value for the Phi. // If there are any other uses of the comparison, we cannot merge it with // other comparisons as we would create an orphan use of the value. if (!CmpI->hasOneUse()) { LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "cmp has several uses\n"); return {}; } if (CmpI->getPredicate() == ExpectedPredicate) { LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "cmp " << (ExpectedPredicate == ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ ? "eq" : "ne") << "\n"); auto Lhs = visitICmpLoadOperand(CmpI->getOperand(0)); if (!Lhs.Base()) return {}; auto Rhs = visitICmpLoadOperand(CmpI->getOperand(1)); if (!Rhs.Base()) return {}; return BCECmpBlock(std::move(Lhs), std::move(Rhs), CmpI->getOperand(0)->getType()->getScalarSizeInBits()); } return {}; } // Visit the given comparison block. If this is a comparison between two valid // BCE atoms, returns the comparison. BCECmpBlock visitCmpBlock(Value *const Val, BasicBlock *const Block, const BasicBlock *const PhiBlock) { if (Block->empty()) return {}; auto *const BranchI = dyn_cast(Block->getTerminator()); if (!BranchI) return {}; LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "branch\n"); if (BranchI->isUnconditional()) { // In this case, we expect an incoming value which is the result of the // comparison. This is the last link in the chain of comparisons (note // that this does not mean that this is the last incoming value, blocks // can be reordered). auto *const CmpI = dyn_cast(Val); if (!CmpI) return {}; LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "icmp\n"); auto Result = visitICmp(CmpI, ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ); Result.CmpI = CmpI; Result.BranchI = BranchI; return Result; } else { // In this case, we expect a constant incoming value (the comparison is // chained). const auto *const Const = dyn_cast(Val); LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "const\n"); if (!Const->isZero()) return {}; LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "false\n"); auto *const CmpI = dyn_cast(BranchI->getCondition()); if (!CmpI) return {}; LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "icmp\n"); assert(BranchI->getNumSuccessors() == 2 && "expecting a cond branch"); BasicBlock *const FalseBlock = BranchI->getSuccessor(1); auto Result = visitICmp( CmpI, FalseBlock == PhiBlock ? ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ : ICmpInst::ICMP_NE); Result.CmpI = CmpI; Result.BranchI = BranchI; return Result; } return {}; } static inline void enqueueBlock(std::vector &Comparisons, BCECmpBlock &Comparison) { LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "Block '" << Comparison.BB->getName() << "': Found cmp of " << Comparison.SizeBits() << " bits between " << Comparison.Lhs().Base() << " + " << Comparison.Lhs().Offset << " and " << Comparison.Rhs().Base() << " + " << Comparison.Rhs().Offset << "\n"); LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "\n"); Comparisons.push_back(Comparison); } // A chain of comparisons. class BCECmpChain { public: BCECmpChain(const std::vector &Blocks, PHINode &Phi); int size() const { return Comparisons_.size(); } #ifdef MERGEICMPS_DOT_ON void dump() const; #endif // MERGEICMPS_DOT_ON bool simplify(const TargetLibraryInfo *const TLI); private: static bool IsContiguous(const BCECmpBlock &First, const BCECmpBlock &Second) { return First.Lhs().Base() == Second.Lhs().Base() && First.Rhs().Base() == Second.Rhs().Base() && First.Lhs().Offset + First.SizeBits() / 8 == Second.Lhs().Offset && First.Rhs().Offset + First.SizeBits() / 8 == Second.Rhs().Offset; } // Merges the given comparison blocks into one memcmp block and update // branches. Comparisons are assumed to be continguous. If NextBBInChain is // null, the merged block will link to the phi block. void mergeComparisons(ArrayRef Comparisons, BasicBlock *const NextBBInChain, PHINode &Phi, const TargetLibraryInfo *const TLI); PHINode &Phi_; std::vector Comparisons_; // The original entry block (before sorting); BasicBlock *EntryBlock_; }; BCECmpChain::BCECmpChain(const std::vector &Blocks, PHINode &Phi) : Phi_(Phi) { assert(!Blocks.empty() && "a chain should have at least one block"); // Now look inside blocks to check for BCE comparisons. std::vector Comparisons; for (size_t BlockIdx = 0; BlockIdx < Blocks.size(); ++BlockIdx) { BasicBlock *const Block = Blocks[BlockIdx]; assert(Block && "invalid block"); BCECmpBlock Comparison = visitCmpBlock(Phi.getIncomingValueForBlock(Block), Block, Phi.getParent()); Comparison.BB = Block; if (!Comparison.IsValid()) { LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "chain with invalid BCECmpBlock, no merge.\n"); return; } if (Comparison.doesOtherWork()) { LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "block '" << Comparison.BB->getName() << "' does extra work besides compare\n"); if (Comparisons.empty()) { // This is the initial block in the chain, in case this block does other // work, we can try to split the block and move the irrelevant // instructions to the predecessor. // // If this is not the initial block in the chain, splitting it wont // work. // // As once split, there will still be instructions before the BCE cmp // instructions that do other work in program order, i.e. within the // chain before sorting. Unless we can abort the chain at this point // and start anew. // // NOTE: we only handle block with single predecessor for now. if (Comparison.canSplit()) { LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "Split initial block '" << Comparison.BB->getName() << "' that does extra work besides compare\n"); Comparison.RequireSplit = true; enqueueBlock(Comparisons, Comparison); } else { LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "ignoring initial block '" << Comparison.BB->getName() << "' that does extra work besides compare\n"); } continue; } // TODO(courbet): Right now we abort the whole chain. We could be // merging only the blocks that don't do other work and resume the // chain from there. For example: // if (a[0] == b[0]) { // bb1 // if (a[1] == b[1]) { // bb2 // some_value = 3; //bb3 // if (a[2] == b[2]) { //bb3 // do a ton of stuff //bb4 // } // } // } // // This is: // // bb1 --eq--> bb2 --eq--> bb3* -eq--> bb4 --+ // \ \ \ \ // ne ne ne \ // \ \ \ v // +------------+-----------+----------> bb_phi // // We can only merge the first two comparisons, because bb3* does // "other work" (setting some_value to 3). // We could still merge bb1 and bb2 though. return; } enqueueBlock(Comparisons, Comparison); } // It is possible we have no suitable comparison to merge. if (Comparisons.empty()) { LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "chain with no BCE basic blocks, no merge\n"); return; } EntryBlock_ = Comparisons[0].BB; Comparisons_ = std::move(Comparisons); #ifdef MERGEICMPS_DOT_ON errs() << "BEFORE REORDERING:\n\n"; dump(); #endif // MERGEICMPS_DOT_ON // Reorder blocks by LHS. We can do that without changing the // semantics because we are only accessing dereferencable memory. llvm::sort(Comparisons_.begin(), Comparisons_.end(), [](const BCECmpBlock &a, const BCECmpBlock &b) { return a.Lhs() < b.Lhs(); }); #ifdef MERGEICMPS_DOT_ON errs() << "AFTER REORDERING:\n\n"; dump(); #endif // MERGEICMPS_DOT_ON } #ifdef MERGEICMPS_DOT_ON void BCECmpChain::dump() const { errs() << "digraph dag {\n"; errs() << " graph [bgcolor=transparent];\n"; errs() << " node [color=black,style=filled,fillcolor=lightyellow];\n"; errs() << " edge [color=black];\n"; for (size_t I = 0; I < Comparisons_.size(); ++I) { const auto &Comparison = Comparisons_[I]; errs() << " \"" << I << "\" [label=\"%" << Comparison.Lhs().Base()->getName() << " + " << Comparison.Lhs().Offset << " == %" << Comparison.Rhs().Base()->getName() << " + " << Comparison.Rhs().Offset << " (" << (Comparison.SizeBits() / 8) << " bytes)\"];\n"; const Value *const Val = Phi_.getIncomingValueForBlock(Comparison.BB); if (I > 0) errs() << " \"" << (I - 1) << "\" -> \"" << I << "\";\n"; errs() << " \"" << I << "\" -> \"Phi\" [label=\"" << *Val << "\"];\n"; } errs() << " \"Phi\" [label=\"Phi\"];\n"; errs() << "}\n\n"; } #endif // MERGEICMPS_DOT_ON bool BCECmpChain::simplify(const TargetLibraryInfo *const TLI) { // First pass to check if there is at least one merge. If not, we don't do // anything and we keep analysis passes intact. { bool AtLeastOneMerged = false; for (size_t I = 1; I < Comparisons_.size(); ++I) { if (IsContiguous(Comparisons_[I - 1], Comparisons_[I])) { AtLeastOneMerged = true; break; } } if (!AtLeastOneMerged) return false; } // Remove phi references to comparison blocks, they will be rebuilt as we // merge the blocks. for (const auto &Comparison : Comparisons_) { Phi_.removeIncomingValue(Comparison.BB, false); } // If entry block is part of the chain, we need to make the first block // of the chain the new entry block of the function. BasicBlock *Entry = &Comparisons_[0].BB->getParent()->getEntryBlock(); for (size_t I = 1; I < Comparisons_.size(); ++I) { if (Entry == Comparisons_[I].BB) { BasicBlock *NEntryBB = BasicBlock::Create(Entry->getContext(), "", Entry->getParent(), Entry); BranchInst::Create(Entry, NEntryBB); break; } } // Point the predecessors of the chain to the first comparison block (which is // the new entry point) and update the entry block of the chain. if (EntryBlock_ != Comparisons_[0].BB) { EntryBlock_->replaceAllUsesWith(Comparisons_[0].BB); EntryBlock_ = Comparisons_[0].BB; } // Effectively merge blocks. int NumMerged = 1; for (size_t I = 1; I < Comparisons_.size(); ++I) { if (IsContiguous(Comparisons_[I - 1], Comparisons_[I])) { ++NumMerged; } else { // Merge all previous comparisons and start a new merge block. mergeComparisons( makeArrayRef(Comparisons_).slice(I - NumMerged, NumMerged), Comparisons_[I].BB, Phi_, TLI); NumMerged = 1; } } mergeComparisons(makeArrayRef(Comparisons_) .slice(Comparisons_.size() - NumMerged, NumMerged), nullptr, Phi_, TLI); return true; } void BCECmpChain::mergeComparisons(ArrayRef Comparisons, BasicBlock *const NextBBInChain, PHINode &Phi, const TargetLibraryInfo *const TLI) { assert(!Comparisons.empty()); const auto &FirstComparison = *Comparisons.begin(); BasicBlock *const BB = FirstComparison.BB; LLVMContext &Context = BB->getContext(); if (Comparisons.size() >= 2) { // If there is one block that requires splitting, we do it now, i.e. // just before we know we will collapse the chain. The instructions // can be executed before any of the instructions in the chain. auto C = std::find_if(Comparisons.begin(), Comparisons.end(), [](const BCECmpBlock &B) { return B.RequireSplit; }); if (C != Comparisons.end()) C->split(EntryBlock_); LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "Merging " << Comparisons.size() << " comparisons\n"); const auto TotalSize = std::accumulate(Comparisons.begin(), Comparisons.end(), 0, [](int Size, const BCECmpBlock &C) { return Size + C.SizeBits(); }) / 8; // Incoming edges do not need to be updated, and both GEPs are already // computing the right address, we just need to: // - replace the two loads and the icmp with the memcmp // - update the branch // - update the incoming values in the phi. FirstComparison.BranchI->eraseFromParent(); FirstComparison.CmpI->eraseFromParent(); FirstComparison.Lhs().LoadI->eraseFromParent(); FirstComparison.Rhs().LoadI->eraseFromParent(); IRBuilder<> Builder(BB); const auto &DL = Phi.getModule()->getDataLayout(); Value *const MemCmpCall = emitMemCmp( FirstComparison.Lhs().GEP, FirstComparison.Rhs().GEP, ConstantInt::get(DL.getIntPtrType(Context), TotalSize), Builder, DL, TLI); Value *const MemCmpIsZero = Builder.CreateICmpEQ( MemCmpCall, ConstantInt::get(Type::getInt32Ty(Context), 0)); // Add a branch to the next basic block in the chain. if (NextBBInChain) { Builder.CreateCondBr(MemCmpIsZero, NextBBInChain, Phi.getParent()); Phi.addIncoming(ConstantInt::getFalse(Context), BB); } else { Builder.CreateBr(Phi.getParent()); Phi.addIncoming(MemCmpIsZero, BB); } // Delete merged blocks. for (size_t I = 1; I < Comparisons.size(); ++I) { BasicBlock *CBB = Comparisons[I].BB; CBB->replaceAllUsesWith(BB); CBB->eraseFromParent(); } } else { assert(Comparisons.size() == 1); // There are no blocks to merge, but we still need to update the branches. LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "Only one comparison, updating branches\n"); if (NextBBInChain) { if (FirstComparison.BranchI->isConditional()) { LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "conditional -> conditional\n"); // Just update the "true" target, the "false" target should already be // the phi block. assert(FirstComparison.BranchI->getSuccessor(1) == Phi.getParent()); FirstComparison.BranchI->setSuccessor(0, NextBBInChain); Phi.addIncoming(ConstantInt::getFalse(Context), BB); } else { LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "unconditional -> conditional\n"); // Replace the unconditional branch by a conditional one. FirstComparison.BranchI->eraseFromParent(); IRBuilder<> Builder(BB); Builder.CreateCondBr(FirstComparison.CmpI, NextBBInChain, Phi.getParent()); Phi.addIncoming(FirstComparison.CmpI, BB); } } else { if (FirstComparison.BranchI->isConditional()) { LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "conditional -> unconditional\n"); // Replace the conditional branch by an unconditional one. FirstComparison.BranchI->eraseFromParent(); IRBuilder<> Builder(BB); Builder.CreateBr(Phi.getParent()); Phi.addIncoming(FirstComparison.CmpI, BB); } else { LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "unconditional -> unconditional\n"); Phi.addIncoming(FirstComparison.CmpI, BB); } } } } std::vector getOrderedBlocks(PHINode &Phi, BasicBlock *const LastBlock, int NumBlocks) { // Walk up from the last block to find other blocks. std::vector Blocks(NumBlocks); assert(LastBlock && "invalid last block"); BasicBlock *CurBlock = LastBlock; for (int BlockIndex = NumBlocks - 1; BlockIndex > 0; --BlockIndex) { if (CurBlock->hasAddressTaken()) { // Somebody is jumping to the block through an address, all bets are // off. LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "skip: block " << BlockIndex << " has its address taken\n"); return {}; } Blocks[BlockIndex] = CurBlock; auto *SinglePredecessor = CurBlock->getSinglePredecessor(); if (!SinglePredecessor) { // The block has two or more predecessors. LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "skip: block " << BlockIndex << " has two or more predecessors\n"); return {}; } if (Phi.getBasicBlockIndex(SinglePredecessor) < 0) { // The block does not link back to the phi. LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "skip: block " << BlockIndex << " does not link back to the phi\n"); return {}; } CurBlock = SinglePredecessor; } Blocks[0] = CurBlock; return Blocks; } bool processPhi(PHINode &Phi, const TargetLibraryInfo *const TLI) { LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "processPhi()\n"); if (Phi.getNumIncomingValues() <= 1) { LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "skip: only one incoming value in phi\n"); return false; } // We are looking for something that has the following structure: // bb1 --eq--> bb2 --eq--> bb3 --eq--> bb4 --+ // \ \ \ \ // ne ne ne \ // \ \ \ v // +------------+-----------+----------> bb_phi // // - The last basic block (bb4 here) must branch unconditionally to bb_phi. // It's the only block that contributes a non-constant value to the Phi. // - All other blocks (b1, b2, b3) must have exactly two successors, one of // them being the phi block. // - All intermediate blocks (bb2, bb3) must have only one predecessor. // - Blocks cannot do other work besides the comparison, see doesOtherWork() // The blocks are not necessarily ordered in the phi, so we start from the // last block and reconstruct the order. BasicBlock *LastBlock = nullptr; for (unsigned I = 0; I < Phi.getNumIncomingValues(); ++I) { if (isa(Phi.getIncomingValue(I))) continue; if (LastBlock) { // There are several non-constant values. LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "skip: several non-constant values\n"); return false; } if (!isa(Phi.getIncomingValue(I)) || cast(Phi.getIncomingValue(I))->getParent() != Phi.getIncomingBlock(I)) { // Non-constant incoming value is not from a cmp instruction or not // produced by the last block. We could end up processing the value // producing block more than once. // // This is an uncommon case, so we bail. LLVM_DEBUG( dbgs() << "skip: non-constant value not from cmp or not from last block.\n"); return false; } LastBlock = Phi.getIncomingBlock(I); } if (!LastBlock) { // There is no non-constant block. LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "skip: no non-constant block\n"); return false; } if (LastBlock->getSingleSuccessor() != Phi.getParent()) { LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "skip: last block non-phi successor\n"); return false; } const auto Blocks = getOrderedBlocks(Phi, LastBlock, Phi.getNumIncomingValues()); if (Blocks.empty()) return false; BCECmpChain CmpChain(Blocks, Phi); if (CmpChain.size() < 2) { LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "skip: only one compare block\n"); return false; } return CmpChain.simplify(TLI); } class MergeICmps : public FunctionPass { public: static char ID; MergeICmps() : FunctionPass(ID) { initializeMergeICmpsPass(*PassRegistry::getPassRegistry()); } bool runOnFunction(Function &F) override { if (skipFunction(F)) return false; const auto &TLI = getAnalysis().getTLI(); const auto &TTI = getAnalysis().getTTI(F); auto PA = runImpl(F, &TLI, &TTI); return !PA.areAllPreserved(); } private: void getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const override { AU.addRequired(); AU.addRequired(); } PreservedAnalyses runImpl(Function &F, const TargetLibraryInfo *TLI, const TargetTransformInfo *TTI); }; PreservedAnalyses MergeICmps::runImpl(Function &F, const TargetLibraryInfo *TLI, const TargetTransformInfo *TTI) { LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "MergeICmpsPass: " << F.getName() << "\n"); // We only try merging comparisons if the target wants to expand memcmp later. // The rationale is to avoid turning small chains into memcmp calls. if (!TTI->enableMemCmpExpansion(true)) return PreservedAnalyses::all(); // If we don't have memcmp avaiable we can't emit calls to it. if (!TLI->has(LibFunc_memcmp)) return PreservedAnalyses::all(); bool MadeChange = false; for (auto BBIt = ++F.begin(); BBIt != F.end(); ++BBIt) { // A Phi operation is always first in a basic block. if (auto *const Phi = dyn_cast(&*BBIt->begin())) MadeChange |= processPhi(*Phi, TLI); } if (MadeChange) return PreservedAnalyses::none(); return PreservedAnalyses::all(); } } // namespace char MergeICmps::ID = 0; INITIALIZE_PASS_BEGIN(MergeICmps, "mergeicmps", "Merge contiguous icmps into a memcmp", false, false) INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(TargetLibraryInfoWrapperPass) INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(TargetTransformInfoWrapperPass) INITIALIZE_PASS_END(MergeICmps, "mergeicmps", "Merge contiguous icmps into a memcmp", false, false) Pass *llvm::createMergeICmpsPass() { return new MergeICmps(); }