Searched refs:HAVE_ARGUMENT (Results 1 – 14 of 14) sorted by relevance
94 #define HAVE_ARGUMENT 90 /* Opcodes from here have an argument: */ macro166 #define HAS_ARG(op) ((op) >= HAVE_ARGUMENT)
68 #define HAVE_ARGUMENT 90 macro142 #define HAS_ARG(op) ((op) >= HAVE_ARGUMENT)
87 if op >= HAVE_ARGUMENT:125 if op >= HAVE_ARGUMENT:165 if op >= HAVE_ARGUMENT:
124 HAVE_ARGUMENT = 90 # Opcodes from here have an argument: variable
23 HAVE_ARGUMENT = dis.HAVE_ARGUMENT variable37 if op >= HAVE_ARGUMENT:
772 if op >= dis.HAVE_ARGUMENT:
34 if op >= dis.HAVE_ARGUMENT:
115 self.assertEqual(dis.opmap["STORE_NAME"], dis.HAVE_ARGUMENT)
128 HAVE_ARGUMENT = 90 # Opcodes from here have an argument: variable
410 if op >= HAVE_ARGUMENT:
302 if (op >= HAVE_ARGUMENT) { in frame_setlineno()344 if (op >= HAVE_ARGUMENT) { in frame_setlineno()
1192 .. opcode:: HAVE_ARGUMENT1196 (``< HAVE_ARGUMENT`` and ``>= HAVE_ARGUMENT``, respectively).1199 Now every instruction has an argument, but opcodes ``< HAVE_ARGUMENT``1200 ignore it. Before, only opcodes ``>= HAVE_ARGUMENT`` had an argument.
870 .. opcode:: HAVE_ARGUMENT ()873 opcodes which don't take arguments ``< HAVE_ARGUMENT`` and those which do874 ``>= HAVE_ARGUMENT``.
441 self.assertEqual(dis.opmap["STORE_NAME"], dis.HAVE_ARGUMENT)450 if opcode < dis.HAVE_ARGUMENT: