| /external/skqp/src/gpu/effects/ |
| D | GrPorterDuffXferProcessor.cpp | 796 BlendFormula formula; in analysis_properties() local
798 formula = gLCDBlendTable[(int)mode]; in analysis_properties()
800 formula = gBlendTable[color.isOpaque()][hasCoverage][(int)mode]; in analysis_properties()
803 if (formula.canTweakAlphaForCoverage() && !isLCD) { in analysis_properties()
821 (formula.hasSecondaryOutput() && !caps.shaderCaps()->dualSourceBlendingSupport())) { in analysis_properties()
832 if (formula.hasSecondaryOutput()) { in analysis_properties()
838 if (!formula.modifiesDst() || !formula.usesInputColor()) { in analysis_properties()
928 BlendFormula formula = get_blend_formula(false, false, false, blendmode); in MakeNoCoverageXP() local
929 return sk_make_sp<PorterDuffXferProcessor>(formula, GrProcessorAnalysisCoverage::kNone); in MakeNoCoverageXP()
|
| /external/skia/src/gpu/effects/ |
| D | GrPorterDuffXferProcessor.cpp | 799 BlendFormula formula; in analysis_properties() local
801 formula = gLCDBlendTable[(int)mode]; in analysis_properties()
803 formula = gBlendTable[color.isOpaque()][hasCoverage][(int)mode]; in analysis_properties()
806 if (formula.canTweakAlphaForCoverage() && !isLCD) { in analysis_properties()
824 (formula.hasSecondaryOutput() && !caps.shaderCaps()->dualSourceBlendingSupport())) { in analysis_properties()
835 if (formula.hasSecondaryOutput()) { in analysis_properties()
845 if (!formula.modifiesDst() || !formula.usesInputColor()) { in analysis_properties()
936 BlendFormula formula = get_blend_formula(false, false, false, blendmode); in MakeNoCoverageXP() local
937 return sk_make_sp<PorterDuffXferProcessor>(formula, GrProcessorAnalysisCoverage::kNone); in MakeNoCoverageXP()
|
| /external/python/cpython2/Demo/tkinter/guido/ |
| D | ss1.py | 390 def __init__(self, formula, fmt="%s", alignment=RIGHT): argument
392 self.formula = formula
393 self.translated = translate(self.formula)
427 self.formula)
431 for part in re.split('(\w+)', self.formula):
442 def translate(formula): argument
450 for part in re.split(r"(\w+(?::\w+)?)", formula):
569 text = '=' + cell.formula
825 formula = "%s*%s" % (c1, c2)
826 cell = FormulaCell(formula)
|
| /external/python/cpython3/Tools/demo/ |
| D | ss1.py | 378 def __init__(self, formula, fmt="%s", alignment=RIGHT): argument
380 self.formula = formula
381 self.translated = translate(self.formula)
412 escape(self.formula))
416 for part in re.split(r'(\w+)', self.formula):
427 def translate(formula): argument
435 for part in re.split(r"(\w+(?::\w+)?)", formula):
554 text = '=' + cell.formula
809 formula = "%s*%s" % (c1, c2)
810 cell = FormulaCell(formula)
|
| /external/javaparser/javaparser-symbol-solver-testing/src/test/java/com/github/javaparser/symbolsolver/resolution/typeinference/constraintformulas/ |
| D | ConstraintFormulaTest.java | 36 …ExpressionCompatibleWithType formula = new ExpressionCompatibleWithType(typeSolver, e, inferenceVa… in testExpressionCompatibleWithTypeReduce1() local
38 ConstraintFormula.ReductionResult res1 = formula.reduce(BoundSet.empty()); in testExpressionCompatibleWithTypeReduce1()
|
| /external/skia/experimental/docs/ |
| D | animationCommon.js | 166 if ('number' == typeof(action.formula)) {
167 targetObject[targetField] = action.formula;
192 assert('formula' in action && 'string' == typeof(action.formula));
194 action.func = new Function('value', 'params', "return " + action.formula);
|
| /external/skqp/experimental/docs/ |
| D | animationCommon.js | 166 if ('number' == typeof(action.formula)) {
167 targetObject[targetField] = action.formula;
192 assert('formula' in action && 'string' == typeof(action.formula));
194 action.func = new Function('value', 'params', "return " + action.formula);
|
| /external/libxml2/test/relaxng/ |
| D | proofsystem.rng | 18 <define name="formula">
19 <element name="formula">
|
| /external/libnl/doc/api/ |
| D | .gitignore | 7 formula.repository
|
| /external/capstone/packages/homebrew/ |
| D | README | 1 This directory contains the Homebrew formula for Capstone.
|
| /external/capstone/packages/macports/devel/capstone/files/ |
| D | patch-Makefile.diff | 7 -# Homebrew wants to make sure its formula does not disable FORTIFY_SOURCE
|
| /external/swiftshader/third_party/llvm-7.0/llvm/test/CodeGen/PowerPC/ |
| D | ppc-redzone-alignment-bug.ll | 1 ; Note the formula for negative number alignment calculation should be y = x & ~(n-1) rather than y…
|
| /external/pdfium/third_party/lcms/ |
| D | 0019-utf8.patch | 65 …// first and last curve segments shall be specified in terms of a formula, whereas the other segme…
66 // specified either in terms of a formula, or by a sampled curve.
|
| D | 0026-more-unsupported-characters.patch | 64 // vcgt formula is:
|
| /external/swiftshader/third_party/llvm-7.0/llvm/test/Transforms/LoopStrengthReduce/X86/ |
| D | canonical-2.ll | 3 ; PR33077. Check the LSR Use formula to be inserted is already canonicalized and
|
| D | canonical.ll | 2 ; Check LSR formula canonicalization will put loop invariant regs before
|
| D | sibling-loops.ll | 2 ; We find it is very bad to allow LSR formula containing SCEVAddRecExpr Reg
|
| /external/swiftshader/third_party/llvm-7.0/llvm/test/CodeGen/Mips/ |
| D | addressing-mode.ll | 6 ; Check that LSR doesn't choose a solution with a formula "reg + 4*reg".
|
| /external/llvm/test/CodeGen/Mips/ |
| D | addressing-mode.ll | 6 ; Check that LSR doesn't choose a solution with a formula "reg + 4*reg".
|
| /external/clang/include/clang/AST/ |
| D | CommentCommands.td | 181 def FDollar : VerbatimBlockCommand<"f$">; // Inline LaTeX formula
182 defm FBracket : VerbatimBlockCommand<"f[", "f]">; // Displayed LaTeX formula
|
| /external/google-styleguide/docguide/ |
| D | philosophy.md | 39 essential to this formula, but it is the best and most widely supported
|
| /external/tensorflow/tensorflow/lite/g3doc/convert/ |
| D | cmdline_reference.md | 75 to the following formula:
79 the inference code according to the above formula, before proceeding
|
| /external/python/cpython2/Lib/test/ |
| D | math_testcases.txt | 367 -- inputs that cause problems for the standard reflection formula,
425 -- the formula expm1(x) = 2 * sinh(x/2) * exp(x/2) doesn't work so
|
| /external/skqp/site/dev/design/conical/ |
| D | index.md | 154 hopefully soon be upgraded to the algorithm described here) mainly uses formula $$t = 0.5 \cdot
266 *Proof.* Simply plug $r_1 = 1$ into the formula of Lemma 3. $\square$
323 formula in the lemma.
|
| /external/skia/site/dev/design/conical/ |
| D | index.md | 154 hopefully soon be upgraded to the algorithm described here) mainly uses formula $$t = 0.5 \cdot
266 *Proof.* Simply plug $r_1 = 1$ into the formula of Lemma 3. $\square$
323 formula in the lemma.
|