Lines Matching refs:traditional

10 that explored the tradeoffs of using this simplified form vs the traditional
63 We started by discussing a representation that uses the traditional polyhedral
225 density. The 'traditional' form introduces an extra level of abstraction
271 are directly equivalent: a traditional instruction with a limited domain (e.g.
275 branches in the IR: the traditional approach allows instruction splitting, the
278 It is important to point out that the traditional form wins on compactness in
290 In contrast, the traditional form has significant complexity in the lowering
297 An advantage for the traditional form is that it is easier to perform certain
319 what target code will be generated. With the traditional form, these analyses
330 important cases. That said, the traditional polyhedral representation makes it
344 they are defined based on traditional dominance. In the simplified form, this is
349 In the traditional form though, this is not the case: it seems that a lot of
375 The traditional form has multiple encodings for the same sorts of behavior: you
389 compactness of the traditional form is a negative for this purpose: reasoning
400 One hybrid alternative is to support both the traditional and simplified forms
405 1.  Early performance transformations could be done on the traditional form.
408     transforms that don't benefit much from the traditional form could be run.