Lines Matching full:would

53 invocations would be moved to a separate Python source file.  Running
54 that Python file would produce a dynamically-linked library.  There
55 would be no caching logic involved; you would need to run it
59 When distributed, the same file would be run (once) during
64 A major difference with the existing verify() approach would be that
65 the ``.so/.dll/.dylib`` file would not be immediately loaded into the
66 process; you would load it only from the installed program at
71 Additionally, this would solve another issue: every import of a large
76 proposed change, all the cdef() code would be pre-parsed and stored in
77 the dynamically-linked library, and no CRC would be needed.  This
78 would massively reduce the import times.
94 would help make it happen sooner rather than later.
100 2'500 US$ for supporting the development time.  This would cover 2.5
105 cover all the basics.  An extended grant size of 4'000 US$ would be