| /external/cldr/tools/cldr-code/src/test/java/org/unicode/cldr/unittest/ |
| D | TestXMLSource.java | 71 source.putValueAtDPath("//ldml/foo[@alt=\"short-proposed-x\"]", "x"); in TestGetPathsWithValue()
72 source.putValueAtDPath("//ldml/foo[@alt=\"short-proposed-x\"][@type=\"wide\"]", "x"); in TestGetPathsWithValue()
94 "//ldml/foo[@alt=\"short-proposed-x\"] not found", in TestGetPathsWithValue()
95 result.contains("//ldml/foo[@alt=\"short-proposed-x\"]")); in TestGetPathsWithValue()
97 "//ldml/foo[@alt=\"short-proposed-x\"][@type=\"wide\"] not found", in TestGetPathsWithValue()
98 result.contains("//ldml/foo[@alt=\"short-proposed-x\"][@type=\"wide\"]")); in TestGetPathsWithValue()
101 xpath = "//ldml/foo[@alt=\"short-proposed\"]"; in TestGetPathsWithValue()
105 "//ldml/foo[@alt=\"short-proposed-x\"] not found", in TestGetPathsWithValue()
106 result.contains("//ldml/foo[@alt=\"short-proposed-x\"]")); in TestGetPathsWithValue()
111 "//ldml/foo[@alt=\"short-proposed-x\"][@type=\"wide\"] not found", in TestGetPathsWithValue()
[all …]
|
| /external/googleapis/google/ads/googleads/v16/resources/ |
| D | account_budget_proposal.proto | 39 // All fields prefixed with 'proposed' may not necessarily be applied directly.
40 // For example, proposed spending limits may be adjusted before their
41 // application. This is true if the 'proposed' field has an 'approved'
121 // The proposed start date time of the account-level budget, which cannot be
124 // Immutable. The proposed start date time in yyyy-mm-dd hh:mm:ss format.
128 // Immutable. The proposed start date time as a well-defined type, for
134 // The proposed end date time of the account-level budget, which cannot be in
137 // Immutable. The proposed end date time in yyyy-mm-dd hh:mm:ss format.
141 // Immutable. The proposed end date time as a well-defined type, for
159 // The proposed spending limit.
[all …]
|
| D | account_budget.proto | 38 // as well as the most recently approved changes to the budget and proposed
39 // changes that are pending approval. The proposed changes that are pending
155 // Output only. The proposed start time of the account-level budget in
156 // yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss format. If a start time type of NOW was proposed,
164 // For example, if a new budget is approved after the proposed start time,
193 // The proposed end time of the account-level budget.
195 // Output only. The proposed end time in yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss format.
199 // Output only. The proposed end time as a well-defined type, for example,
208 // after the proposed end time, the approved end time is the time of approval.
220 // The proposed spending limit.
[all …]
|
| /external/googleapis/google/ads/googleads/v15/resources/ |
| D | account_budget_proposal.proto | 39 // All fields prefixed with 'proposed' may not necessarily be applied directly.
40 // For example, proposed spending limits may be adjusted before their
41 // application. This is true if the 'proposed' field has an 'approved'
121 // The proposed start date time of the account-level budget, which cannot be
124 // Immutable. The proposed start date time in yyyy-mm-dd hh:mm:ss format.
128 // Immutable. The proposed start date time as a well-defined type, for
134 // The proposed end date time of the account-level budget, which cannot be in
137 // Immutable. The proposed end date time in yyyy-mm-dd hh:mm:ss format.
141 // Immutable. The proposed end date time as a well-defined type, for
159 // The proposed spending limit.
[all …]
|
| D | account_budget.proto | 38 // as well as the most recently approved changes to the budget and proposed
39 // changes that are pending approval. The proposed changes that are pending
155 // Output only. The proposed start time of the account-level budget in
156 // yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss format. If a start time type of NOW was proposed,
164 // For example, if a new budget is approved after the proposed start time,
193 // The proposed end time of the account-level budget.
195 // Output only. The proposed end time in yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss format.
199 // Output only. The proposed end time as a well-defined type, for example,
208 // after the proposed end time, the approved end time is the time of approval.
220 // The proposed spending limit.
[all …]
|
| /external/googleapis/google/ads/googleads/v14/resources/ |
| D | account_budget_proposal.proto | 39 // All fields prefixed with 'proposed' may not necessarily be applied directly.
40 // For example, proposed spending limits may be adjusted before their
41 // application. This is true if the 'proposed' field has an 'approved'
121 // The proposed start date time of the account-level budget, which cannot be
124 // Immutable. The proposed start date time in yyyy-mm-dd hh:mm:ss format.
128 // Immutable. The proposed start date time as a well-defined type, for
134 // The proposed end date time of the account-level budget, which cannot be in
137 // Immutable. The proposed end date time in yyyy-mm-dd hh:mm:ss format.
141 // Immutable. The proposed end date time as a well-defined type, for
159 // The proposed spending limit.
[all …]
|
| D | account_budget.proto | 38 // as well as the most recently approved changes to the budget and proposed
39 // changes that are pending approval. The proposed changes that are pending
155 // Output only. The proposed start time of the account-level budget in
156 // yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss format. If a start time type of NOW was proposed,
164 // For example, if a new budget is approved after the proposed start time,
193 // The proposed end time of the account-level budget.
195 // Output only. The proposed end time in yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss format.
199 // Output only. The proposed end time as a well-defined type, for example,
208 // after the proposed end time, the approved end time is the time of approval.
220 // The proposed spending limit.
[all …]
|
| /external/googleapis/google/cloud/policysimulator/v1/ |
| D | simulator.proto | 49 // and your proposed policy, and compares those results to determine how your
50 // principals' access might change under the proposed policy.
192 // (baseline) policies and the principal's access under the proposed
197 // proposed policies.
358 // the current (baseline) policies and under the proposed (simulated) policies.
360 // proposed policies were applied.
363 // (baseline) policies and the proposed (simulated) policies for a single
372 // (baseline) policies and the proposed (simulated) policies for a single
376 // between the current (baseline) policies and proposed (simulated) policies.
386 // The principal's access under both the current policies and the proposed
[all …]
|
| /external/cldr/docs/site/index/survey-tool/ |
| D | bulk-data-upload.md | 57 <!-- The draft attribute and alt=proposed value are ignored. Comments are ignored. -->
59 <script alt="proposed-ABCDEF" type="Latn" draft="unconfirmed">Latin</script> <!-- OK. -->
63 …<script alt="proposed-ABCDEF" type="Mong" draft="unconfirmed">Latin</script> <!-- ERR: duplicate -…
65 …<script alt="proposed-ABCDEF" type="Brai" draft="unconfirmed">Latin</script> <!-- ERR: duplicate -…
67 …<script alt="proposed-ABCDEF" type="Hant" draft="unconfirmed">Latin</script> <!-- ERR: duplicate -…
69 …<script alt="proposed-ABCDEF" type="Deva" draft="unconfirmed">Latin</script> <!-- ERR: duplicate -…
71 …<script alt="proposed-ABCDEF" type="0" draft="unconfirmed">Latin</script> <!-- ERR: bad 'type' …
|
| /external/cronet/stable/third_party/abseil-cpp/ |
| D | ABSEIL_ISSUE_TEMPLATE.md | 3 ## [Short title of proposed API change(s)]
11 proposed API changes. No controversial claims should be made here. If there are
17 ## Proposed API Change (s)
19 [Please clearly describe the API change(s) being proposed. If multiple changes,
|
| /external/cronet/tot/third_party/abseil-cpp/ |
| D | ABSEIL_ISSUE_TEMPLATE.md | 3 ## [Short title of proposed API change(s)]
11 proposed API changes. No controversial claims should be made here. If there are
17 ## Proposed API Change (s)
19 [Please clearly describe the API change(s) being proposed. If multiple changes,
|
| /external/abseil-cpp/ |
| D | ABSEIL_ISSUE_TEMPLATE.md | 3 ## [Short title of proposed API change(s)]
11 proposed API changes. No controversial claims should be made here. If there are
17 ## Proposed API Change (s)
19 [Please clearly describe the API change(s) being proposed. If multiple changes,
|
| /external/rust/android-crates-io/crates/grpcio-sys/grpc/third_party/abseil-cpp/ |
| D | ABSEIL_ISSUE_TEMPLATE.md | 3 ## [Short title of proposed API change(s)]
11 proposed API changes. No controversial claims should be made here. If there are
17 ## Proposed API Change (s)
19 [Please clearly describe the API change(s) being proposed. If multiple changes,
|
| /external/angle/third_party/abseil-cpp/ |
| D | ABSEIL_ISSUE_TEMPLATE.md | 3 ## [Short title of proposed API change(s)]
11 proposed API changes. No controversial claims should be made here. If there are
17 ## Proposed API Change (s)
19 [Please clearly describe the API change(s) being proposed. If multiple changes,
|
| /external/openscreen/third_party/abseil/src/ |
| D | ABSEIL_ISSUE_TEMPLATE.md | 3 ## [Short title of proposed API change(s)]
11 proposed API changes. No controversial claims should be made here. If there are
17 ## Proposed API Change (s)
19 [Please clearly describe the API change(s) being proposed. If multiple changes,
|
| /external/cldr/tools/cldr-code/src/main/java/org/unicode/cldr/test/ |
| D | CheckAlt.java | 13 // determine if we have an alt=...proposed
14 // if we have one, and there is not a non-proposed version -- in this same file, unaliased,
25 if (path.indexOf("proposed") <= 0) { in handleCheck()
46 .setMessage("Proposed item but no unproposed variant", new Object[] {})); in handleCheck()
|
| /external/aws-sdk-java-v2/docs/design/ |
| D | README.md | 9 significantly from the state proposed in these documents.*
14 **Proposed**
16 *These features are being proposed for development. These features will
49 **Proposed**
|
| /external/rust/android-crates-io/crates/grpcio-sys/grpc/third_party/xds/proposals/ |
| D | XRFC-TEMPLATE.md | 14 [An introduction of the necessary background and the problem being solved by the proposed change.]
22 [A precise statement of the proposed change.]
31 …ular client is going to get the implementation first, this section should list the proposed order.]
|
| /external/sdv/vsomeip/third_party/boost/asio/doc/ |
| D | std_executors.qbk | 8 [section:std_executors Proposed Standard Executors]
10 Boost.Asio provides a complete implementation of the proposed standard executors, as
24 proposed standard executors. For compatibility, these classes also meet the
38 proposed standard executors, and with Networking TS executors. Boost.Asio's
40 meets; the proposed standard executor model is used in preference if both are
212 Boost.Asio uses an extensive set of traits to implement all of the proposed standard
|
| /external/sdv/vsomeip/third_party/boost/smart_ptr/doc/smart_ptr/ |
| D | history.adoc | 19 Greg Colvin http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/1994/N0555.pdf[proposed]
27 Beman Dawes proposed reviving the original semantics under the names `safe_ptr` and `counted_ptr`,
76 …d Greg Colvin http://open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2003/n1450.html[proposed] `shared_ptr`
82 …Dawes http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2007/n2351.htm[proposed] a number of enha…
95 Peter Dimov http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2013/n3640.html[proposed] the extens…
|
| /external/cldr/docs/site/development/development-process/design-proposals/ |
| D | bcp47-syntax-mapping.md | 64 ## 1. Proposed BCP47 subtag syntax
88 | Current | Proposed |
117 | Current | Proposed |
132 | Current | Proposed |
142 | Current | Proposed |
150 | Current | Proposed |
157 | Current | Proposed |
170 | Current | Proposed |
194 | Current (CVS snapshot) | Proposed |
216 …ffset), for example, UTCE01 means 1 hour east from UTC (Etc/GMT-1). The proposed short ID list is …
|
| D | proposed-collation-additions.md | 2 title: Proposed Collation Additions
5 # Proposed Collation Additions
22 ### Proposed LDML syntax:
50 ### Proposed LDML BCP47 subtag syntax changes:
69 ### Proposed LDML syntax:
|
| /external/wayland-protocols/freedesktop.org/ |
| D | GOVERNANCE.md | 88 1. A new protocol may be proposed by submitting a merge request to the
96 4. When the proposed protocol meets all requirements for inclusion per section
99 5. Amendments to existing protocols may be proposed by the same process, with
101 6. Declaring a protocol stable may be proposed by the same process, with the
142 1. An amendment to this document may be proposed any member by
|
| /external/aws-sdk-java-v2/docs/design/services/s3/transfermanager/listener/ |
| D | DecisionLog.md | 36 …may be sufficient to implement the proposed TransferListener interface. Therefore we believe we ca…
41 1. **Do we need the functionality proposed in `ExecutionMode`?**
44 …o provide async future completion, where Runnable::run would be analogous to the proposed "INLINE".
|
| /external/skia/include/private/base/ |
| D | SkTLogic.h | 19 // The sknonstd namespace contains things we would like to be proposed and feel std-ish.
23 // Alternate proposed names are 'propagate', 'augment', or 'append' (and 'add', but already taken).
42 // Alternate proposed names are 'replace', 'transfer', or 'qualify_from'.
|