Lines Matching full:code

40 contains a reason code for the exception.
59 to executable code. This code is hidden inside the user access macros.
62 the code generated by the preprocessor and the compiler. I selected
65 The original code in sysrq.c line 587::
132 see what code gcc generates::
172  >                   CONTENTS, ALLOC, LOAD, READONLY, CODE
174  >                   CONTENTS, ALLOC, LOAD, READONLY, CODE
189 file. But first we want to find out what happened to our code in the
237 told the assembler to move the following code to the specified
252 the original assembly code: > 1:      movb (%ebx),%dl
255 The local label 3 (backwards again) is the address of the code to handle
257 the original assembly code: > 3:      movl $-14,%eax
260 The assembly code::
285    and returns the address of the associated fault handle code c0199ff5.
287    handle code and returns.
288 #. execution continues in the fault handling code.
297 we set EAX to -EFAULT in the exception handler code. Well, the
299 successful, -EFAULT on failure. Our original code did not test this
300 return value, however the inline assembly code in get_user tries to
305 only use exceptions for code in the .text section.  Any other section
312 as relative offsets from the table itself. The assembly code changed
320 and the C-code that uses these values converts back to absolute addresses
333      This is legacy case that just jumps to the fixup code