Lines Matching refs:not

5 do not support them.  One purpose of this document is therefore to
12 Therefore, a load-load control dependency will not preserve ordering
19 This is not guaranteed to provide any ordering because some types of CPUs
31 However, stores are not speculated.  This means that ordering is
45 by a store, and this compiler-generated load would not be ordered by
57 load, it does *not* force the compiler to actually use the loaded value.
141 Given this transformation, the CPU is not required to respect the ordering
143 tempting to add a barrier(), but this does not help.  The conditional
184 not necessarily order the code following the entire "if" statement:
213 in question (including functions invoked by those two clauses), and not
220       However, they do *not* guarantee any other sort of ordering:
229       smp_store_release().  Please note that it is *not* sufficient to use
249       do *not* apply to code beyond the end of that "if" statement.
253   (*) Control dependencies do *not* provide multicopy atomicity.  If you
257   (*) Compilers do not understand control dependencies.  It is therefore
258       your job to ensure that they do not break your code.