Home
last modified time | relevance | path

Searched refs:rule (Results 1 – 12 of 12) sorted by relevance

/scripts/gendwarfksyms/
Dkabi.c82 struct rule { struct
98 static inline unsigned int rule_hash(const struct rule *rule) in rule_hash() argument
100 return rule_values_hash(rule->type, rule->target); in rule_hash()
210 struct rule *rule; in kabi_read_rules() local
231 rule = xmalloc(sizeof(struct rule)); in kabi_read_rules()
233 rule->type = type; in kabi_read_rules()
234 rule->target = xstrdup(get_rule_field(&rule_str, &left)); in kabi_read_rules()
235 rule->value = xstrdup(get_rule_field(&rule_str, &left)); in kabi_read_rules()
237 hash_add(rules, &rule->hash, rule_hash(rule)); in kabi_read_rules()
240 rule->target, rule->value); in kabi_read_rules()
[all …]
/scripts/coccinelle/iterators/
Dlist_entry_update.cocci4 /// The first rule finds such a reassignment and the second rule checks
/scripts/coccinelle/misc/
Dadd_namespace.cocci28 // Dummy rule for report mode that would otherwise be empty and make spatch
Duninitialized_var.cocci18 /// this kind were cleaned-up from the kernel. This cocci rule checks that
Dflexible_array.cocci74 // position @q with rule "only_field" simplifies
/scripts/coccinelle/free/
Ddevm_free.cocci13 /// false positives. There is no rule for the request_region and
/scripts/coccinelle/null/
Dbadzero.cocci120 // This rule may lead to inconsistent path problems, if E is defined in two
Dderef_null.cocci214 // It is need because the previous rule as already made a "change".
/scripts/
Dspdxcheck.py287 for rule in exclude_rules:
288 if rule.match(fpath):
DKbuild.include92 # The rule defined shall write to stdout the content of the new file.
160 # if_changed_rule - as if_changed but execute rule instead
/scripts/coccinelle/api/
Dstream_open.cocci188 // XXX maybe_steam.fops cannot be used in other rules - it gives "bad rule maybe_stream or bad vari…
/scripts/coccinelle/api/alloc/
Dzalloc-simple.cocci6 /// Note in particular that there are no ...s in the rule, so all of the