• Home
  • Line#
  • Scopes#
  • Navigate#
  • Raw
  • Download
1# Maintaining V8 in Node.js
2
3## Background
4
5V8 follows the Chromium release schedule. The support horizon for Chromium is
6different compared to the support horizon for Node.js. As a result, Node.js
7needs to support multiple versions of V8 longer than what upstream needs
8to support. V8 branches in Node.js lack of an official maintenance process due
9to a missing LTS supported branch.
10
11This document attempts to outline the current maintenance processes, proposes
12a workflow for maintaining the V8 branches in both Node.js LTS and current
13releases, and discusses how the Node.js and V8 teams at Google can help.
14
15## V8 release schedule
16
17V8 and Chromium follow a
18[roughly 6-week release cadence][ChromiumReleaseCalendar]. At any given time
19there are three V8 branches that are **active**.
20
21For example, at the time of this writing:
22
23* **Stable**: V8 5.4 is currently shipping as part of Chromium stable. This
24  branch was created approx. 6 weeks before from when V8 5.3 shipped as stable.
25* **Beta**: V8 5.5 is currently in beta. It will be promoted to stable next;
26  approximately 6 weeks after V8 5.4 shipped as stable.
27* **Master**: V8 tip-of-tree corresponds to V8 5.6. This branch gets regularly
28  released as part of the Chromium **canary** builds. This branch will be
29  promoted to beta next when V8 5.5 ships as stable.
30
31All older branches are abandoned and are not maintained by the V8 team.
32
33### V8 merge process overview
34
35The process for backporting bug fixes to active branches is officially
36documented [on the V8 wiki][V8MergingPatching]. The summary of the process is:
37
38* V8 only supports active branches. There is no testing done on any branches
39  older than the current stable/beta/master.
40* A fix needing backport is tagged w/ *merge-request-x.x* tag. This can be done
41  by anyone interested in getting the fix backported. Issues with this tag are
42  reviewed by the V8 team regularly as candidates for backporting.
43* Fixes need some 'baking time' before they can be approved for backporting.
44  This means waiting a few days to ensure that no issues are detected on the
45  canary/beta builds.
46* Once ready, the issue is tagged w/ *merge-approved-x.x* and one can do the
47  actual merge by using the scripts on the [wiki page][V8MergingPatching].
48* Merge requests to an abandoned branch will be rejected.
49* Only bug fixes are accepted for backporting.
50
51## Node.js support requirements
52
53At any given time Node.js needs to be maintaining a few different V8 branches
54for the various Current, LTS, and nightly releases. At present this list
55includes the following branches<sup>1</sup>:
56
57<table>
58  <tr>
59   <td><strong>Release</strong>
60   </td>
61   <td><strong>Support Start</strong>
62   </td>
63   <td><strong>Support End</strong>
64   </td>
65   <td><strong>V8 version</strong>
66   </td>
67   <td><strong>V8 branch released</strong>
68   </td>
69   <td><strong>V8 branch abandoned</strong>
70   </td>
71  </tr>
72  <tr>
73   <td>Node.js 4.x
74   </td>
75   <td>2015-10-01
76   </td>
77   <td>April 2018
78   </td>
79   <td>4.5
80   </td>
81   <td>2015-09-01
82   </td>
83   <td>2015-10-13
84   </td>
85  </tr>
86  <tr>
87   <td>Node.js 6.x
88   </td>
89   <td>2016-04-01
90   </td>
91   <td>April 2019
92   </td>
93   <td>5.1
94   </td>
95   <td>2016-05-31
96   </td>
97   <td>2016-06-26
98   </td>
99  </tr>
100  <tr>
101   <td>Node.js 8.x
102   </td>
103   <td>2017-05-30
104   </td>
105   <td>December 2019
106   </td>
107   <td>6.1 (soon to be 6.2)
108   </td>
109   <td>2017-10-17 (6.2)
110   </td>
111   <td>~2017-12-05 (6.2)
112   </td>
113  </tr>
114    <tr>
115   <td>Node.js 9.x
116   </td>
117   <td>2017-10-31
118   </td>
119   <td>April 2018
120   </td>
121   <td>6.2
122   </td>
123   <td>2017-10-17
124   </td>
125   <td>~2017-12-05
126   </td>
127  </tr>
128  <tr>
129   <td>master
130   </td>
131   <td>N/A
132   </td>
133   <td>N/A
134   </td>
135   <td>6.2
136   </td>
137   <td>2017-10-17
138   </td>
139   <td>~2017-12-05
140   </td>
141  </tr>
142</table>
143
144The versions of V8 used in Node.js v4.x, v6.x, and 8.x have already been
145abandoned by upstream V8. However, Node.js needs to continue supporting
146these branches for many months (Current branches) or several
147years (LTS branches).
148
149## Maintenance process
150
151Once a bug in Node.js has been identified to be caused by V8, the first step is
152to identify the versions of Node.js and V8 affected. The bug may be present in
153multiple different locations, each of which follows a slightly different
154process.
155
156* Unfixed bugs. The bug exists in the V8 master branch.
157* Fixed, but needs backport. The bug may need porting to one or more branches.
158  * Backporting to active branches.
159  * Backporting to abandoned branches.
160* Backports identified by the V8 team. Bugs identified by upstream V8 that we
161  haven't encountered in Node.js yet.
162
163### Unfixed upstream bugs
164
165If the bug can be reproduced on the [Node.js `canary` branch][], Chromium
166canary, or V8 tip-of-tree, and the test case is valid, then the bug needs to be
167fixed upstream first.
168
169* Start by opening a bug upstream using [this template][V8TemplateUpstreamBug].
170* Make sure to include a link to the corresponding Node.js issue
171  (if one exists).
172* If the fix is simple enough, you may fix it yourself;
173  [contributions][V8Contributing] are welcome.
174* V8's build waterfall tests your change.
175* Once the bug is fixed it may still need backporting, if it exists in other V8
176  branches that are still active or are branches that Node.js cares about.
177  Follow the process for backporting below.
178
179### Backporting to active branches
180
181If the bug exists in any of the active V8 branches, we may need to get the fix
182backported. At any given time, there are [two active branches][V8ActiveBranches]
183(beta and stable) in addition to master. The following steps are needed to
184backport the fix:
185
186* Identify which version of V8 the bug was fixed in.
187* Identify if any active V8 branches still contain the bug:
188* A tracking bug is needed to request a backport.
189  * If there isn't already a V8 bug tracking the fix, open a new merge request
190    bug using this [Node.js specific template][V8TemplateMergeRequest].
191  * If a bug already exists
192    * Add a reference to the GitHub issue.
193    * Attach *merge-request-x.x* labels to the bug for any active branches
194      that still contain the bug.
195* Once the merge has been approved, it should be merged using the
196  [merge script documented in the V8 wiki][V8MergingPatching]. Merging requires
197  commit access to the V8 repository. If you don't have commit access you can
198  indicate someone on the V8 team can do the merge for you.
199* It is possible that the merge request may not get approved, for example if it
200  is considered to be a feature or otherwise too risky for V8 stable. In such
201  cases we float the patch on the Node.js side. See the process on 'Backporting
202  to Abandoned branches'.
203* Once the fix has been merged upstream, it can be picked up during an update of
204  the V8 branch (see below).
205
206### Backporting to abandoned branches
207
208Abandoned V8 branches are supported in the Node.js repository. The fix needs
209to be cherry-picked in the Node.js repository and V8-CI must test the change.
210
211* For each abandoned V8 branch corresponding to an LTS branch that is affected
212  by the bug:
213  * Checkout a branch off the appropriate *vY.x-staging* branch (e.g.
214    *v6.x-staging* to fix an issue in V8 5.1).
215  * Cherry-pick the commit(s) from the V8 repository.
216  * Increase the `v8_embedder_string` number in `common.gypi`.
217  * In some cases the patch may require extra effort to merge in case V8 has
218    changed substantially. For important issues, we may be able to lean on the
219    V8 team to get help with reimplementing the patch.
220  * Open a cherry-pick pull request on `nodejs/node` targeting the
221    *vY.x-staging* branch and notify the `@nodejs/v8` team.
222  * Run the Node.js [V8 CI][] in addition to the [Node.js CI][].
223    The CI uses the `test-v8` target in the `Makefile`, which uses
224    `tools/make-v8.sh` to reconstruct a git tree in the `deps/v8` directory to
225    run V8 tests<sup>2</sup>.
226
227The [`git-node`][] tool can be used to simplify this task. Run
228`git node v8 backport <sha>` to cherry-pick a commit.
229
230An example for workflow how to cherry-pick consider the bug
231[RegExp show inconsistent result with other browsers](https://crbug.com/v8/5199).
232From the bug we can see that it was merged by V8 into 5.2 and 5.3, and not into
233V8 5.1 (since it was already abandoned). Since Node.js `v6.x` uses V8 5.1, the
234fix needed to be cherry-picked. To cherry-pick, here's an example workflow:
235
236* Download and apply the commit linked-to in the issue (in this case a51f429).
237  `curl -L https://github.com/v8/v8/commit/a51f429.patch | git am -3
238  --directory=deps/v8`. If the branches have diverged significantly, this may
239  not apply cleanly. It may help to try to cherry-pick the merge to the oldest
240  branch that was done upstream in V8. In this example, this would be the patch
241  from the merge to 5.2. The hope is that this would be closer to the V8 5.1,
242  and has a better chance of applying cleanly.
243* Modify the commit message to match the format we use for V8 backports and
244  replace yourself as the author. `git commit --amend --reset-author`. You may
245  want to add extra description if necessary to indicate the impact of the fix
246  on Node.js. In this case the original issue was descriptive enough. Example:
247
248```console
249deps: cherry-pick a51f429 from V8 upstream
250
251Original commit message:
252  [regexp] Fix case-insensitive matching for one-byte subjects.
253
254  The bug occurs because we do not canonicalize character class ranges
255  before adding case equivalents. While adding case equivalents, we abort
256  early for one-byte subject strings, assuming that the ranges are sorted.
257  Which they are not.
258
259  R=marja@chromium.org
260  BUG=v8:5199
261
262  Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2159683002
263  Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#37833}
264
265Refs: https://github.com/v8/v8/commit/a51f429772d1e796744244128c9feeab4c26a854
266PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/7833
267```
268
269* Open a PR against the `v6.x-staging` branch in the Node.js repository. Launch
270  the normal and [V8 CI][] using the Node.js CI system. We only needed to
271  backport to `v6.x` as the other LTS branches weren't affected by this bug.
272
273### Backports identified by the V8 team
274
275For bugs found through the browser or other channels, the V8 team marks bugs
276that might be applicable to the abandoned branches in use by Node.js. This is
277done through manual tagging by the V8 team and through an automated process that
278tags any fix that gets backported to the stable branch (as it is likely
279candidate for backporting further).
280
281Such fixes are tagged with the following labels in the V8 issue tracker:
282
283* `NodeJS-Backport-Review` ([V8][NodeJS-Backport-Review-V8],
284  [Chromium][NodeJS-Backport-Review-Chromium]): to be reviewed if this is
285  applicable to abandoned branches in use by Node.js. This list if regularly
286  reviewed by the Node.js team at Google to determine applicability to Node.js.
287* `NodeJS-Backport-Approved` ([V8][NodeJS-Backport-Approved-V8],
288  [Chromium][NodeJS-Backport-Approved-Chromium]): marks bugs that are deemed
289  relevant to Node.js and should be backported.
290* `NodeJS-Backport-Done` ([V8][NodeJS-Backport-Done-V8],
291  [Chromium][NodeJS-Backport-Done-Chromium]): Backport for Node.js has been
292  performed already.
293* `NodeJS-Backport-Rejected` ([V8][NodeJS-Backport-Rejected-V8],
294  [Chromium][NodeJS-Backport-Rejected-Chromium]): Backport for Node.js is not
295  desired.
296
297The backlog of issues with such is regularly reviewed by the node-team at Google
298to shepherd through the backport process. External contributors are welcome to
299collaborate on the backport process as well. Some of the bugs may be
300security issues and will not be visible to external collaborators.
301
302## Updating V8
303
304Node.js keeps a vendored copy of V8 inside of the deps/ directory. In addition,
305Node.js may need to float patches that do not exist upstream. This means that
306some care may need to be taken to update the vendored copy of V8.
307
308V8 builds against the version of ICU supplied by Node.js,
309see [maintaining-icu.md](./maintaining-icu.md) for special considerations.
310Specifically, a V8 update may necessitate an ICU update.
311
312### Minor updates (patch level)
313
314Because there may be floating patches on the version of V8 in Node.js, it is
315safest to apply the patch level updates as a patch. For example, imagine that
316upstream V8 is at 5.0.71.47 and Node.js is at 5.0.71.32. It would be best to
317compute the diff between these tags on the V8 repository, and then apply that
318patch on the copy of V8 in Node.js. This should preserve the patches/backports
319that Node.js may be floating (or else cause a merge conflict).
320
321The rough outline of the process is:
322
323```bash
324# Assuming your fork of Node.js is checked out in $NODE_DIR
325# and you want to update the Node.js master branch.
326# Find the current (OLD) version in
327# $NODE_DIR/deps/v8/include/v8-version.h
328cd $NODE_DIR
329git checkout master
330git merge --ff-only origin/master
331git checkout -b V8_NEW_VERSION
332curl -L https://github.com/v8/v8/compare/${V8_OLD_VERSION}...${V8_NEW_VERSION}.patch | git apply --directory=deps/v8
333# You may want to amend the commit message to describe the nature of the update
334```
335
336V8 also keeps tags of the form *5.4-lkgr* which point to the *Last Known Good
337Revision* from the 5.4 branch that can be useful in the update process above.
338
339The [`git-node`][] tool can be used to simplify this task. Run `git node v8 minor`
340to apply a minor update.
341
342### Major updates
343
344We upgrade the version of V8 in Node.js master whenever a V8 release goes stable
345upstream, that is, whenever a new release of Chrome comes out.
346
347Upgrading major versions would be much harder to do with the patch mechanism
348above. A better strategy is to
349
3501. Audit the current master branch and look at the patches that have been
351   floated since the last major V8 update.
3521. Replace the copy of V8 in Node.js with a fresh checkout of the latest stable
353   V8 branch. Special care must be taken to recursively update the DEPS that V8
354   has a compile time dependency on (at the moment of this writing, these are
355   only trace_event and gtest_prod.h)
3561. Reset the `v8_embedder_string` variable to "-node.0" in `common.gypi`.
3571. Refloat (cherry-pick) all the patches from list computed in 1) as necessary.
358   Some of the patches may no longer be necessary.
359
360To audit for floating patches:
361
362```bash
363git log --oneline deps/v8
364```
365
366To replace the copy of V8 in Node.js, use the [`git-node`][] tool. For example,
367if you want to replace the copy of V8 in Node.js with the branch-head for V8 5.1
368branch:
369
370```bash
371cd $NODE_DIR
372git node v8 major --branch=5.1-lkgr
373```
374
375This should be followed up with manual refloating of all relevant patches.
376
377## Proposal: Using a fork repository to track upstream V8
378
379The fact that Node.js keeps a vendored, potentially edited copy of V8 in deps/
380makes the above processes a bit complicated. An alternative proposal would be to
381create a fork of V8 at `nodejs/v8` that would be used to maintain the V8
382branches. This has several benefits:
383
384* The process to update the version of V8 in Node.js could be automated to track
385  the tips of various V8 branches in `nodejs/v8`.
386* It would simplify cherry-picking and porting of fixes between branches as the
387  version bumps in `v8-version.h` would happen as part of this update instead of
388  on every change.
389* It would simplify the V8-CI and make it more automatable.
390* The history of the V8 branch in `nodejs/v8` becomes purer and it would make it
391  easier to pull in the V8 team for help with reviewing.
392* It would make it simpler to setup an automated build that tracks Node.js
393  master + V8 lkgr integration build.
394
395This would require some tooling to:
396
397* A script that would update the V8 in a specific Node.js branch with V8 from
398  upstream (dependent on branch abandoned vs. active).
399* We need a script to bump V8 version numbers when a new version of V8 is
400  promoted from `nodejs/v8` to `nodejs/node`.
401* Enabled the V8-CI build in Jenkins to build from the `nodejs/v8` fork.
402
403<!-- Footnotes themselves at the bottom. -->
404### Notes
405
406<sup>1</sup>Node.js 0.12 and older are intentionally omitted from this document
407as their support has ended.
408
409<sup>2</sup>The V8 tests still require Python 2. To run these tests locally,
410you can run `PYTHON2 ./configure.py` before running `make test-v8`, in the root
411of this repository. On macOS, this also requires a full Xcode install,
412not just the "command line tools" for Xcode.
413
414[ChromiumReleaseCalendar]: https://www.chromium.org/developers/calendar
415[Node.js CI]: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/
416[Node.js `canary` branch]: https://github.com/nodejs/node-v8/tree/canary
417[NodeJS-Backport-Approved-Chromium]: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/list?can=1&q=label%3ANodeJS-Backport-Approved
418[NodeJS-Backport-Approved-V8]: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/v8/issues/list?can=1&q=label%3ANodeJS-Backport-Approved
419[NodeJS-Backport-Done-Chromium]: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/list?can=1&q=label%3ANodeJS-Backport-Done
420[NodeJS-Backport-Done-V8]: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/v8/issues/list?can=1&q=label%3ANodeJS-Backport-Done
421[NodeJS-Backport-Rejected-Chromium]: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/list?can=1&q=label%3ANodeJS-Backport-Rejected
422[NodeJS-Backport-Rejected-V8]: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/v8/issues/list?can=1&q=label%3ANodeJS-Backport-Rejected
423[NodeJS-Backport-Review-Chromium]: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/list?can=1&q=label%3ANodeJS-Backport-Review
424[NodeJS-Backport-Review-V8]: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/v8/issues/list?can=1&q=label%3ANodeJS-Backport-Review
425[V8 CI]: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-commit-v8-linux/
426[V8ActiveBranches]: https://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8.branches/console
427[V8Contributing]: https://github.com/v8/v8/wiki/Contributing
428[V8MergingPatching]: https://github.com/v8/v8/wiki/Merging%20&%20Patching
429[V8TemplateMergeRequest]: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/v8/issues/entry?template=Node.js%20merge%20request
430[V8TemplateUpstreamBug]: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/v8/issues/entry?template=Node.js%20upstream%20bug
431[`git-node`]: https://github.com/nodejs/node-core-utils/blob/HEAD/docs/git-node.md#git-node-v8
432