• Home
  • Line#
  • Scopes#
  • Navigate#
  • Raw
  • Download
1// Protocol Buffers - Google's data interchange format
2// Copyright 2008 Google Inc.  All rights reserved.
3//
4// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style
5// license that can be found in the LICENSE file or at
6// https://developers.google.com/open-source/licenses/bsd
7
8syntax = "proto3";
9
10// These proto descriptors have at one time been reported as an issue or defect.
11// They are kept here to replicate the issue, and continue to verify the fix.
12
13// Issue: Non-"Google.Protobuffers" namespace will ensure that protobuffer
14// library types are qualified
15package unittest_issues;
16
17import "google/protobuf/struct.proto";
18
19option csharp_namespace = "UnitTest.Issues.TestProtos";
20
21// Issue 307: when generating doubly-nested types, any references
22// should be of the form A.Types.B.Types.C.
23message Issue307 {
24  message NestedOnce {
25    message NestedTwice {}
26  }
27}
28
29// Old issue 13:
30// http://code.google.com/p/protobuf-csharp-port/issues/detail?id=13 New issue
31// 309: https://github.com/protocolbuffers/protobuf/issues/309
32
33// message A {
34//    optional int32 _A = 1;
35// }
36
37// message B {
38//    optional int32 B_ = 1;
39// }
40
41// message AB {
42//     optional int32 a_b = 1;
43// }
44
45// Similar issue with numeric names
46// Java code failed too, so probably best for this to be a restriction.
47// See https://github.com/protocolbuffers/protobuf/issues/308
48// message NumberField {
49//    optional int32 _01 = 1;
50// }
51
52// issue 19 - negative enum values
53
54enum NegativeEnum {
55  NEGATIVE_ENUM_ZERO = 0;
56  FiveBelow = -5;
57  MinusOne = -1;
58}
59
60message NegativeEnumMessage {
61  NegativeEnum value = 1;
62  repeated NegativeEnum values = 2 [packed = false];
63  repeated NegativeEnum packed_values = 3 [packed = true];
64}
65
66// Issue 21: http://code.google.com/p/protobuf-csharp-port/issues/detail?id=21
67// Decorate fields with [deprecated=true] as [System.Obsolete]
68
69message DeprecatedChild {
70  option deprecated = true;
71}
72
73enum DeprecatedEnum {
74  option deprecated = true;
75
76  DEPRECATED_ZERO = 0 [deprecated = true];
77  one = 1;
78}
79
80message DeprecatedFieldsMessage {
81  int32 PrimitiveValue = 1 [deprecated = true];
82  repeated int32 PrimitiveArray = 2 [deprecated = true];
83
84  DeprecatedChild MessageValue = 3 [deprecated = true];
85  repeated DeprecatedChild MessageArray = 4 [deprecated = true];
86
87  DeprecatedEnum EnumValue = 5 [deprecated = true];
88  repeated DeprecatedEnum EnumArray = 6 [deprecated = true];
89}
90
91// Issue 45: http://code.google.com/p/protobuf-csharp-port/issues/detail?id=45
92message ItemField {
93  int32 item = 1;
94}
95
96message ReservedNames {
97  // Force a nested type called Types
98  message SomeNestedType {}
99
100  int32 types = 1;
101  int32 descriptor = 2;
102}
103
104message TestJsonFieldOrdering {
105  // These fields are deliberately not declared in numeric
106  // order, and the oneof fields aren't contiguous either.
107  // This allows for reasonably robust tests of JSON output
108  // ordering.
109  // TestFieldOrderings in unittest_proto3.proto is similar,
110  // but doesn't include oneofs.
111  // TODO: Consider adding oneofs to TestFieldOrderings, although
112  // that will require fixing other tests in multiple platforms.
113  // Alternatively, consider just adding this to
114  // unittest_proto3.proto if multiple platforms want it.
115
116  int32 plain_int32 = 4;
117
118  oneof o1 {
119    string o1_string = 2;
120    int32 o1_int32 = 5;
121  }
122
123  string plain_string = 1;
124
125  oneof o2 {
126    int32 o2_int32 = 6;
127    string o2_string = 3;
128  }
129}
130
131message TestJsonName {
132  // Message for testing the effects for of the json_name option
133  string name = 1;
134  string description = 2 [json_name = "desc"];
135  string guid = 3 [json_name = "exid"];
136}
137
138// Issue 3200: When merging two messages which use the same
139// oneof case, which is itself a message type, the submessages should
140// be merged.
141message OneofMerging {
142  message Nested {
143    int32 x = 1;
144    int32 y = 2;
145  }
146
147  oneof value {
148    string text = 1;
149    Nested nested = 2;
150  }
151}
152
153message NullValueOutsideStruct {
154  oneof value {
155    string string_value = 1;
156    google.protobuf.NullValue null_value = 2;
157  }
158}
159
160message NullValueNotInOneof {
161  google.protobuf.NullValue null_value = 2;
162}
163
164message MixedRegularAndOptional {
165  string regular_field = 1;
166  optional string optional_field = 2;
167}
168
169message OneofWithNoneField {
170  oneof test {
171    string x = 1;
172    string none = 2;
173  }
174}
175
176message OneofWithNoneName {
177  oneof none {
178    string x = 1;
179    string y = 2;
180  }
181}
182
183// Issue 8810
184message DisambiguateCommonMembers {
185  int32 disambiguate_common_members = 1;
186  int32 types = 2;
187  int32 descriptor = 3;
188  int32 equals = 4;
189  int32 to_string = 5;
190  int32 get_hash_code = 6;
191  int32 write_to = 7;
192  int32 clone = 8;
193  int32 calculate_size = 9;
194  int32 merge_from = 10;
195  int32 on_construction = 11;
196  int32 parser = 12;
197}
198
199message Issue11987Message {
200  int32 a = 1 [json_name = 'b'];
201  int32 b = 2 [json_name = 'a'];
202  int32 c = 3 [json_name = 'd'];
203}
204