• Home
  • Line#
  • Scopes#
  • Navigate#
  • Raw
  • Download
1#
2# distutils/version.py
3#
4# Implements multiple version numbering conventions for the
5# Python Module Distribution Utilities.
6#
7# $Id$
8#
9
10"""Provides classes to represent module version numbers (one class for
11each style of version numbering).  There are currently two such classes
12implemented: StrictVersion and LooseVersion.
13
14Every version number class implements the following interface:
15  * the 'parse' method takes a string and parses it to some internal
16    representation; if the string is an invalid version number,
17    'parse' raises a ValueError exception
18  * the class constructor takes an optional string argument which,
19    if supplied, is passed to 'parse'
20  * __str__ reconstructs the string that was passed to 'parse' (or
21    an equivalent string -- ie. one that will generate an equivalent
22    version number instance)
23  * __repr__ generates Python code to recreate the version number instance
24  * _cmp compares the current instance with either another instance
25    of the same class or a string (which will be parsed to an instance
26    of the same class, thus must follow the same rules)
27"""
28
29import re
30
31class Version:
32    """Abstract base class for version numbering classes.  Just provides
33    constructor (__init__) and reproducer (__repr__), because those
34    seem to be the same for all version numbering classes; and route
35    rich comparisons to _cmp.
36    """
37
38    def __init__ (self, vstring=None):
39        if vstring:
40            self.parse(vstring)
41
42    def __repr__ (self):
43        return "%s ('%s')" % (self.__class__.__name__, str(self))
44
45    def __eq__(self, other):
46        c = self._cmp(other)
47        if c is NotImplemented:
48            return c
49        return c == 0
50
51    def __lt__(self, other):
52        c = self._cmp(other)
53        if c is NotImplemented:
54            return c
55        return c < 0
56
57    def __le__(self, other):
58        c = self._cmp(other)
59        if c is NotImplemented:
60            return c
61        return c <= 0
62
63    def __gt__(self, other):
64        c = self._cmp(other)
65        if c is NotImplemented:
66            return c
67        return c > 0
68
69    def __ge__(self, other):
70        c = self._cmp(other)
71        if c is NotImplemented:
72            return c
73        return c >= 0
74
75
76# Interface for version-number classes -- must be implemented
77# by the following classes (the concrete ones -- Version should
78# be treated as an abstract class).
79#    __init__ (string) - create and take same action as 'parse'
80#                        (string parameter is optional)
81#    parse (string)    - convert a string representation to whatever
82#                        internal representation is appropriate for
83#                        this style of version numbering
84#    __str__ (self)    - convert back to a string; should be very similar
85#                        (if not identical to) the string supplied to parse
86#    __repr__ (self)   - generate Python code to recreate
87#                        the instance
88#    _cmp (self, other) - compare two version numbers ('other' may
89#                        be an unparsed version string, or another
90#                        instance of your version class)
91
92
93class StrictVersion (Version):
94
95    """Version numbering for anal retentives and software idealists.
96    Implements the standard interface for version number classes as
97    described above.  A version number consists of two or three
98    dot-separated numeric components, with an optional "pre-release" tag
99    on the end.  The pre-release tag consists of the letter 'a' or 'b'
100    followed by a number.  If the numeric components of two version
101    numbers are equal, then one with a pre-release tag will always
102    be deemed earlier (lesser) than one without.
103
104    The following are valid version numbers (shown in the order that
105    would be obtained by sorting according to the supplied cmp function):
106
107        0.4       0.4.0  (these two are equivalent)
108        0.4.1
109        0.5a1
110        0.5b3
111        0.5
112        0.9.6
113        1.0
114        1.0.4a3
115        1.0.4b1
116        1.0.4
117
118    The following are examples of invalid version numbers:
119
120        1
121        2.7.2.2
122        1.3.a4
123        1.3pl1
124        1.3c4
125
126    The rationale for this version numbering system will be explained
127    in the distutils documentation.
128    """
129
130    version_re = re.compile(r'^(\d+) \. (\d+) (\. (\d+))? ([ab](\d+))?$',
131                            re.VERBOSE | re.ASCII)
132
133
134    def parse (self, vstring):
135        match = self.version_re.match(vstring)
136        if not match:
137            raise ValueError("invalid version number '%s'" % vstring)
138
139        (major, minor, patch, prerelease, prerelease_num) = \
140            match.group(1, 2, 4, 5, 6)
141
142        if patch:
143            self.version = tuple(map(int, [major, minor, patch]))
144        else:
145            self.version = tuple(map(int, [major, minor])) + (0,)
146
147        if prerelease:
148            self.prerelease = (prerelease[0], int(prerelease_num))
149        else:
150            self.prerelease = None
151
152
153    def __str__ (self):
154
155        if self.version[2] == 0:
156            vstring = '.'.join(map(str, self.version[0:2]))
157        else:
158            vstring = '.'.join(map(str, self.version))
159
160        if self.prerelease:
161            vstring = vstring + self.prerelease[0] + str(self.prerelease[1])
162
163        return vstring
164
165
166    def _cmp (self, other):
167        if isinstance(other, str):
168            other = StrictVersion(other)
169
170        if self.version != other.version:
171            # numeric versions don't match
172            # prerelease stuff doesn't matter
173            if self.version < other.version:
174                return -1
175            else:
176                return 1
177
178        # have to compare prerelease
179        # case 1: neither has prerelease; they're equal
180        # case 2: self has prerelease, other doesn't; other is greater
181        # case 3: self doesn't have prerelease, other does: self is greater
182        # case 4: both have prerelease: must compare them!
183
184        if (not self.prerelease and not other.prerelease):
185            return 0
186        elif (self.prerelease and not other.prerelease):
187            return -1
188        elif (not self.prerelease and other.prerelease):
189            return 1
190        elif (self.prerelease and other.prerelease):
191            if self.prerelease == other.prerelease:
192                return 0
193            elif self.prerelease < other.prerelease:
194                return -1
195            else:
196                return 1
197        else:
198            assert False, "never get here"
199
200# end class StrictVersion
201
202
203# The rules according to Greg Stein:
204# 1) a version number has 1 or more numbers separated by a period or by
205#    sequences of letters. If only periods, then these are compared
206#    left-to-right to determine an ordering.
207# 2) sequences of letters are part of the tuple for comparison and are
208#    compared lexicographically
209# 3) recognize the numeric components may have leading zeroes
210#
211# The LooseVersion class below implements these rules: a version number
212# string is split up into a tuple of integer and string components, and
213# comparison is a simple tuple comparison.  This means that version
214# numbers behave in a predictable and obvious way, but a way that might
215# not necessarily be how people *want* version numbers to behave.  There
216# wouldn't be a problem if people could stick to purely numeric version
217# numbers: just split on period and compare the numbers as tuples.
218# However, people insist on putting letters into their version numbers;
219# the most common purpose seems to be:
220#   - indicating a "pre-release" version
221#     ('alpha', 'beta', 'a', 'b', 'pre', 'p')
222#   - indicating a post-release patch ('p', 'pl', 'patch')
223# but of course this can't cover all version number schemes, and there's
224# no way to know what a programmer means without asking him.
225#
226# The problem is what to do with letters (and other non-numeric
227# characters) in a version number.  The current implementation does the
228# obvious and predictable thing: keep them as strings and compare
229# lexically within a tuple comparison.  This has the desired effect if
230# an appended letter sequence implies something "post-release":
231# eg. "0.99" < "0.99pl14" < "1.0", and "5.001" < "5.001m" < "5.002".
232#
233# However, if letters in a version number imply a pre-release version,
234# the "obvious" thing isn't correct.  Eg. you would expect that
235# "1.5.1" < "1.5.2a2" < "1.5.2", but under the tuple/lexical comparison
236# implemented here, this just isn't so.
237#
238# Two possible solutions come to mind.  The first is to tie the
239# comparison algorithm to a particular set of semantic rules, as has
240# been done in the StrictVersion class above.  This works great as long
241# as everyone can go along with bondage and discipline.  Hopefully a
242# (large) subset of Python module programmers will agree that the
243# particular flavour of bondage and discipline provided by StrictVersion
244# provides enough benefit to be worth using, and will submit their
245# version numbering scheme to its domination.  The free-thinking
246# anarchists in the lot will never give in, though, and something needs
247# to be done to accommodate them.
248#
249# Perhaps a "moderately strict" version class could be implemented that
250# lets almost anything slide (syntactically), and makes some heuristic
251# assumptions about non-digits in version number strings.  This could
252# sink into special-case-hell, though; if I was as talented and
253# idiosyncratic as Larry Wall, I'd go ahead and implement a class that
254# somehow knows that "1.2.1" < "1.2.2a2" < "1.2.2" < "1.2.2pl3", and is
255# just as happy dealing with things like "2g6" and "1.13++".  I don't
256# think I'm smart enough to do it right though.
257#
258# In any case, I've coded the test suite for this module (see
259# ../test/test_version.py) specifically to fail on things like comparing
260# "1.2a2" and "1.2".  That's not because the *code* is doing anything
261# wrong, it's because the simple, obvious design doesn't match my
262# complicated, hairy expectations for real-world version numbers.  It
263# would be a snap to fix the test suite to say, "Yep, LooseVersion does
264# the Right Thing" (ie. the code matches the conception).  But I'd rather
265# have a conception that matches common notions about version numbers.
266
267class LooseVersion (Version):
268
269    """Version numbering for anarchists and software realists.
270    Implements the standard interface for version number classes as
271    described above.  A version number consists of a series of numbers,
272    separated by either periods or strings of letters.  When comparing
273    version numbers, the numeric components will be compared
274    numerically, and the alphabetic components lexically.  The following
275    are all valid version numbers, in no particular order:
276
277        1.5.1
278        1.5.2b2
279        161
280        3.10a
281        8.02
282        3.4j
283        1996.07.12
284        3.2.pl0
285        3.1.1.6
286        2g6
287        11g
288        0.960923
289        2.2beta29
290        1.13++
291        5.5.kw
292        2.0b1pl0
293
294    In fact, there is no such thing as an invalid version number under
295    this scheme; the rules for comparison are simple and predictable,
296    but may not always give the results you want (for some definition
297    of "want").
298    """
299
300    component_re = re.compile(r'(\d+ | [a-z]+ | \.)', re.VERBOSE)
301
302    def __init__ (self, vstring=None):
303        if vstring:
304            self.parse(vstring)
305
306
307    def parse (self, vstring):
308        # I've given up on thinking I can reconstruct the version string
309        # from the parsed tuple -- so I just store the string here for
310        # use by __str__
311        self.vstring = vstring
312        components = [x for x in self.component_re.split(vstring)
313                              if x and x != '.']
314        for i, obj in enumerate(components):
315            try:
316                components[i] = int(obj)
317            except ValueError:
318                pass
319
320        self.version = components
321
322
323    def __str__ (self):
324        return self.vstring
325
326
327    def __repr__ (self):
328        return "LooseVersion ('%s')" % str(self)
329
330
331    def _cmp (self, other):
332        if isinstance(other, str):
333            other = LooseVersion(other)
334
335        if self.version == other.version:
336            return 0
337        if self.version < other.version:
338            return -1
339        if self.version > other.version:
340            return 1
341
342
343# end class LooseVersion
344