• Home
  • Line#
  • Scopes#
  • Navigate#
  • Raw
  • Download
1FileCheck - Flexible pattern matching file verifier
2===================================================
3
4SYNOPSIS
5--------
6
7:program:`FileCheck` *match-filename* [*--check-prefix=XXX*] [*--strict-whitespace*]
8
9DESCRIPTION
10-----------
11
12:program:`FileCheck` reads two files (one from standard input, and one
13specified on the command line) and uses one to verify the other.  This
14behavior is particularly useful for the testsuite, which wants to verify that
15the output of some tool (e.g. :program:`llc`) contains the expected information
16(for example, a movsd from esp or whatever is interesting).  This is similar to
17using :program:`grep`, but it is optimized for matching multiple different
18inputs in one file in a specific order.
19
20The ``match-filename`` file specifies the file that contains the patterns to
21match.  The file to verify is read from standard input unless the
22:option:`--input-file` option is used.
23
24OPTIONS
25-------
26
27.. option:: -help
28
29 Print a summary of command line options.
30
31.. option:: --check-prefix prefix
32
33 FileCheck searches the contents of ``match-filename`` for patterns to
34 match.  By default, these patterns are prefixed with "``CHECK:``".
35 If you'd like to use a different prefix (e.g. because the same input
36 file is checking multiple different tool or options), the
37 :option:`--check-prefix` argument allows you to specify one or more
38 prefixes to match. Multiple prefixes are useful for tests which might
39 change for different run options, but most lines remain the same.
40
41.. option:: --check-prefixes prefix1,prefix2,...
42
43 An alias of :option:`--check-prefix` that allows multiple prefixes to be
44 specified as a comma separated list.
45
46.. option:: --input-file filename
47
48  File to check (defaults to stdin).
49
50.. option:: --match-full-lines
51
52 By default, FileCheck allows matches of anywhere on a line. This
53 option will require all positive matches to cover an entire
54 line. Leading and trailing whitespace is ignored, unless
55 :option:`--strict-whitespace` is also specified. (Note: negative
56 matches from ``CHECK-NOT`` are not affected by this option!)
57
58 Passing this option is equivalent to inserting ``{{^ *}}`` or
59 ``{{^}}`` before, and ``{{ *$}}`` or ``{{$}}`` after every positive
60 check pattern.
61
62.. option:: --strict-whitespace
63
64 By default, FileCheck canonicalizes input horizontal whitespace (spaces and
65 tabs) which causes it to ignore these differences (a space will match a tab).
66 The :option:`--strict-whitespace` argument disables this behavior. End-of-line
67 sequences are canonicalized to UNIX-style ``\n`` in all modes.
68
69.. option:: --implicit-check-not check-pattern
70
71  Adds implicit negative checks for the specified patterns between positive
72  checks. The option allows writing stricter tests without stuffing them with
73  ``CHECK-NOT``\ s.
74
75  For example, "``--implicit-check-not warning:``" can be useful when testing
76  diagnostic messages from tools that don't have an option similar to ``clang
77  -verify``. With this option FileCheck will verify that input does not contain
78  warnings not covered by any ``CHECK:`` patterns.
79
80.. option:: --dump-input-on-failure
81
82  When the check fails, dump all of the original input.
83
84.. option:: --enable-var-scope
85
86  Enables scope for regex variables.
87
88  Variables with names that start with ``$`` are considered global and
89  remain set throughout the file.
90
91  All other variables get undefined after each encountered ``CHECK-LABEL``.
92
93.. option:: -D<VAR=VALUE>
94
95  Sets a filecheck variable ``VAR`` with value ``VALUE`` that can be used in
96  ``CHECK:`` lines.
97
98.. option:: -version
99
100 Show the version number of this program.
101
102.. option:: -v
103
104  Print directive pattern matches.
105
106.. option:: -vv
107
108  Print information helpful in diagnosing internal FileCheck issues, such as
109  discarded overlapping ``CHECK-DAG:`` matches, implicit EOF pattern matches,
110  and ``CHECK-NOT:`` patterns that do not have matches.  Implies ``-v``.
111
112.. option:: --allow-deprecated-dag-overlap
113
114  Enable overlapping among matches in a group of consecutive ``CHECK-DAG:``
115  directives.  This option is deprecated and is only provided for convenience
116  as old tests are migrated to the new non-overlapping ``CHECK-DAG:``
117  implementation.
118
119EXIT STATUS
120-----------
121
122If :program:`FileCheck` verifies that the file matches the expected contents,
123it exits with 0.  Otherwise, if not, or if an error occurs, it will exit with a
124non-zero value.
125
126TUTORIAL
127--------
128
129FileCheck is typically used from LLVM regression tests, being invoked on the RUN
130line of the test.  A simple example of using FileCheck from a RUN line looks
131like this:
132
133.. code-block:: llvm
134
135   ; RUN: llvm-as < %s | llc -march=x86-64 | FileCheck %s
136
137This syntax says to pipe the current file ("``%s``") into ``llvm-as``, pipe
138that into ``llc``, then pipe the output of ``llc`` into ``FileCheck``.  This
139means that FileCheck will be verifying its standard input (the llc output)
140against the filename argument specified (the original ``.ll`` file specified by
141"``%s``").  To see how this works, let's look at the rest of the ``.ll`` file
142(after the RUN line):
143
144.. code-block:: llvm
145
146   define void @sub1(i32* %p, i32 %v) {
147   entry:
148   ; CHECK: sub1:
149   ; CHECK: subl
150           %0 = tail call i32 @llvm.atomic.load.sub.i32.p0i32(i32* %p, i32 %v)
151           ret void
152   }
153
154   define void @inc4(i64* %p) {
155   entry:
156   ; CHECK: inc4:
157   ; CHECK: incq
158           %0 = tail call i64 @llvm.atomic.load.add.i64.p0i64(i64* %p, i64 1)
159           ret void
160   }
161
162Here you can see some "``CHECK:``" lines specified in comments.  Now you can
163see how the file is piped into ``llvm-as``, then ``llc``, and the machine code
164output is what we are verifying.  FileCheck checks the machine code output to
165verify that it matches what the "``CHECK:``" lines specify.
166
167The syntax of the "``CHECK:``" lines is very simple: they are fixed strings that
168must occur in order.  FileCheck defaults to ignoring horizontal whitespace
169differences (e.g. a space is allowed to match a tab) but otherwise, the contents
170of the "``CHECK:``" line is required to match some thing in the test file exactly.
171
172One nice thing about FileCheck (compared to grep) is that it allows merging
173test cases together into logical groups.  For example, because the test above
174is checking for the "``sub1:``" and "``inc4:``" labels, it will not match
175unless there is a "``subl``" in between those labels.  If it existed somewhere
176else in the file, that would not count: "``grep subl``" matches if "``subl``"
177exists anywhere in the file.
178
179The FileCheck -check-prefix option
180~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
181
182The FileCheck `-check-prefix` option allows multiple test
183configurations to be driven from one `.ll` file.  This is useful in many
184circumstances, for example, testing different architectural variants with
185:program:`llc`.  Here's a simple example:
186
187.. code-block:: llvm
188
189   ; RUN: llvm-as < %s | llc -mtriple=i686-apple-darwin9 -mattr=sse41 \
190   ; RUN:              | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=X32
191   ; RUN: llvm-as < %s | llc -mtriple=x86_64-apple-darwin9 -mattr=sse41 \
192   ; RUN:              | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=X64
193
194   define <4 x i32> @pinsrd_1(i32 %s, <4 x i32> %tmp) nounwind {
195           %tmp1 = insertelement <4 x i32>; %tmp, i32 %s, i32 1
196           ret <4 x i32> %tmp1
197   ; X32: pinsrd_1:
198   ; X32:    pinsrd $1, 4(%esp), %xmm0
199
200   ; X64: pinsrd_1:
201   ; X64:    pinsrd $1, %edi, %xmm0
202   }
203
204In this case, we're testing that we get the expected code generation with
205both 32-bit and 64-bit code generation.
206
207The "CHECK-NEXT:" directive
208~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
209
210Sometimes you want to match lines and would like to verify that matches
211happen on exactly consecutive lines with no other lines in between them.  In
212this case, you can use "``CHECK:``" and "``CHECK-NEXT:``" directives to specify
213this.  If you specified a custom check prefix, just use "``<PREFIX>-NEXT:``".
214For example, something like this works as you'd expect:
215
216.. code-block:: llvm
217
218   define void @t2(<2 x double>* %r, <2 x double>* %A, double %B) {
219 	%tmp3 = load <2 x double>* %A, align 16
220 	%tmp7 = insertelement <2 x double> undef, double %B, i32 0
221 	%tmp9 = shufflevector <2 x double> %tmp3,
222                               <2 x double> %tmp7,
223                               <2 x i32> < i32 0, i32 2 >
224 	store <2 x double> %tmp9, <2 x double>* %r, align 16
225 	ret void
226
227   ; CHECK:          t2:
228   ; CHECK: 	        movl	8(%esp), %eax
229   ; CHECK-NEXT: 	movapd	(%eax), %xmm0
230   ; CHECK-NEXT: 	movhpd	12(%esp), %xmm0
231   ; CHECK-NEXT: 	movl	4(%esp), %eax
232   ; CHECK-NEXT: 	movapd	%xmm0, (%eax)
233   ; CHECK-NEXT: 	ret
234   }
235
236"``CHECK-NEXT:``" directives reject the input unless there is exactly one
237newline between it and the previous directive.  A "``CHECK-NEXT:``" cannot be
238the first directive in a file.
239
240The "CHECK-SAME:" directive
241~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
242
243Sometimes you want to match lines and would like to verify that matches happen
244on the same line as the previous match.  In this case, you can use "``CHECK:``"
245and "``CHECK-SAME:``" directives to specify this.  If you specified a custom
246check prefix, just use "``<PREFIX>-SAME:``".
247
248"``CHECK-SAME:``" is particularly powerful in conjunction with "``CHECK-NOT:``"
249(described below).
250
251For example, the following works like you'd expect:
252
253.. code-block:: llvm
254
255   !0 = !DILocation(line: 5, scope: !1, inlinedAt: !2)
256
257   ; CHECK:       !DILocation(line: 5,
258   ; CHECK-NOT:               column:
259   ; CHECK-SAME:              scope: ![[SCOPE:[0-9]+]]
260
261"``CHECK-SAME:``" directives reject the input if there are any newlines between
262it and the previous directive.  A "``CHECK-SAME:``" cannot be the first
263directive in a file.
264
265The "CHECK-EMPTY:" directive
266~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
267
268If you need to check that the next line has nothing on it, not even whitespace,
269you can use the "``CHECK-EMPTY:``" directive.
270
271.. code-block:: llvm
272
273   foo
274
275   bar
276   ; CHECK: foo
277   ; CHECK-EMPTY:
278   ; CHECK-NEXT: bar
279
280Just like "``CHECK-NEXT:``" the directive will fail if there is more than one
281newline before it finds the next blank line, and it cannot be the first
282directive in a file.
283
284The "CHECK-NOT:" directive
285~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
286
287The "``CHECK-NOT:``" directive is used to verify that a string doesn't occur
288between two matches (or before the first match, or after the last match).  For
289example, to verify that a load is removed by a transformation, a test like this
290can be used:
291
292.. code-block:: llvm
293
294   define i8 @coerce_offset0(i32 %V, i32* %P) {
295     store i32 %V, i32* %P
296
297     %P2 = bitcast i32* %P to i8*
298     %P3 = getelementptr i8* %P2, i32 2
299
300     %A = load i8* %P3
301     ret i8 %A
302   ; CHECK: @coerce_offset0
303   ; CHECK-NOT: load
304   ; CHECK: ret i8
305   }
306
307The "CHECK-DAG:" directive
308~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
309
310If it's necessary to match strings that don't occur in a strictly sequential
311order, "``CHECK-DAG:``" could be used to verify them between two matches (or
312before the first match, or after the last match). For example, clang emits
313vtable globals in reverse order. Using ``CHECK-DAG:``, we can keep the checks
314in the natural order:
315
316.. code-block:: c++
317
318    // RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -emit-llvm -o - | FileCheck %s
319
320    struct Foo { virtual void method(); };
321    Foo f;  // emit vtable
322    // CHECK-DAG: @_ZTV3Foo =
323
324    struct Bar { virtual void method(); };
325    Bar b;
326    // CHECK-DAG: @_ZTV3Bar =
327
328``CHECK-NOT:`` directives could be mixed with ``CHECK-DAG:`` directives to
329exclude strings between the surrounding ``CHECK-DAG:`` directives. As a result,
330the surrounding ``CHECK-DAG:`` directives cannot be reordered, i.e. all
331occurrences matching ``CHECK-DAG:`` before ``CHECK-NOT:`` must not fall behind
332occurrences matching ``CHECK-DAG:`` after ``CHECK-NOT:``. For example,
333
334.. code-block:: llvm
335
336   ; CHECK-DAG: BEFORE
337   ; CHECK-NOT: NOT
338   ; CHECK-DAG: AFTER
339
340This case will reject input strings where ``BEFORE`` occurs after ``AFTER``.
341
342With captured variables, ``CHECK-DAG:`` is able to match valid topological
343orderings of a DAG with edges from the definition of a variable to its use.
344It's useful, e.g., when your test cases need to match different output
345sequences from the instruction scheduler. For example,
346
347.. code-block:: llvm
348
349   ; CHECK-DAG: add [[REG1:r[0-9]+]], r1, r2
350   ; CHECK-DAG: add [[REG2:r[0-9]+]], r3, r4
351   ; CHECK:     mul r5, [[REG1]], [[REG2]]
352
353In this case, any order of that two ``add`` instructions will be allowed.
354
355If you are defining `and` using variables in the same ``CHECK-DAG:`` block,
356be aware that the definition rule can match `after` its use.
357
358So, for instance, the code below will pass:
359
360.. code-block:: text
361
362  ; CHECK-DAG: vmov.32 [[REG2:d[0-9]+]][0]
363  ; CHECK-DAG: vmov.32 [[REG2]][1]
364  vmov.32 d0[1]
365  vmov.32 d0[0]
366
367While this other code, will not:
368
369.. code-block:: text
370
371  ; CHECK-DAG: vmov.32 [[REG2:d[0-9]+]][0]
372  ; CHECK-DAG: vmov.32 [[REG2]][1]
373  vmov.32 d1[1]
374  vmov.32 d0[0]
375
376While this can be very useful, it's also dangerous, because in the case of
377register sequence, you must have a strong order (read before write, copy before
378use, etc). If the definition your test is looking for doesn't match (because
379of a bug in the compiler), it may match further away from the use, and mask
380real bugs away.
381
382In those cases, to enforce the order, use a non-DAG directive between DAG-blocks.
383
384A ``CHECK-DAG:`` directive skips matches that overlap the matches of any
385preceding ``CHECK-DAG:`` directives in the same ``CHECK-DAG:`` block.  Not only
386is this non-overlapping behavior consistent with other directives, but it's
387also necessary to handle sets of non-unique strings or patterns.  For example,
388the following directives look for unordered log entries for two tasks in a
389parallel program, such as the OpenMP runtime:
390
391.. code-block:: text
392
393    // CHECK-DAG: [[THREAD_ID:[0-9]+]]: task_begin
394    // CHECK-DAG: [[THREAD_ID]]: task_end
395    //
396    // CHECK-DAG: [[THREAD_ID:[0-9]+]]: task_begin
397    // CHECK-DAG: [[THREAD_ID]]: task_end
398
399The second pair of directives is guaranteed not to match the same log entries
400as the first pair even though the patterns are identical and even if the text
401of the log entries is identical because the thread ID manages to be reused.
402
403The "CHECK-LABEL:" directive
404~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
405
406Sometimes in a file containing multiple tests divided into logical blocks, one
407or more ``CHECK:`` directives may inadvertently succeed by matching lines in a
408later block. While an error will usually eventually be generated, the check
409flagged as causing the error may not actually bear any relationship to the
410actual source of the problem.
411
412In order to produce better error messages in these cases, the "``CHECK-LABEL:``"
413directive can be used. It is treated identically to a normal ``CHECK``
414directive except that FileCheck makes an additional assumption that a line
415matched by the directive cannot also be matched by any other check present in
416``match-filename``; this is intended to be used for lines containing labels or
417other unique identifiers. Conceptually, the presence of ``CHECK-LABEL`` divides
418the input stream into separate blocks, each of which is processed independently,
419preventing a ``CHECK:`` directive in one block matching a line in another block.
420If ``--enable-var-scope`` is in effect, all local variables are cleared at the
421beginning of the block.
422
423For example,
424
425.. code-block:: llvm
426
427  define %struct.C* @C_ctor_base(%struct.C* %this, i32 %x) {
428  entry:
429  ; CHECK-LABEL: C_ctor_base:
430  ; CHECK: mov [[SAVETHIS:r[0-9]+]], r0
431  ; CHECK: bl A_ctor_base
432  ; CHECK: mov r0, [[SAVETHIS]]
433    %0 = bitcast %struct.C* %this to %struct.A*
434    %call = tail call %struct.A* @A_ctor_base(%struct.A* %0)
435    %1 = bitcast %struct.C* %this to %struct.B*
436    %call2 = tail call %struct.B* @B_ctor_base(%struct.B* %1, i32 %x)
437    ret %struct.C* %this
438  }
439
440  define %struct.D* @D_ctor_base(%struct.D* %this, i32 %x) {
441  entry:
442  ; CHECK-LABEL: D_ctor_base:
443
444The use of ``CHECK-LABEL:`` directives in this case ensures that the three
445``CHECK:`` directives only accept lines corresponding to the body of the
446``@C_ctor_base`` function, even if the patterns match lines found later in
447the file. Furthermore, if one of these three ``CHECK:`` directives fail,
448FileCheck will recover by continuing to the next block, allowing multiple test
449failures to be detected in a single invocation.
450
451There is no requirement that ``CHECK-LABEL:`` directives contain strings that
452correspond to actual syntactic labels in a source or output language: they must
453simply uniquely match a single line in the file being verified.
454
455``CHECK-LABEL:`` directives cannot contain variable definitions or uses.
456
457FileCheck Pattern Matching Syntax
458~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
459
460All FileCheck directives take a pattern to match.
461For most uses of FileCheck, fixed string matching is perfectly sufficient.  For
462some things, a more flexible form of matching is desired.  To support this,
463FileCheck allows you to specify regular expressions in matching strings,
464surrounded by double braces: ``{{yourregex}}``. FileCheck implements a POSIX
465regular expression matcher; it supports Extended POSIX regular expressions
466(ERE). Because we want to use fixed string matching for a majority of what we
467do, FileCheck has been designed to support mixing and matching fixed string
468matching with regular expressions.  This allows you to write things like this:
469
470.. code-block:: llvm
471
472   ; CHECK: movhpd	{{[0-9]+}}(%esp), {{%xmm[0-7]}}
473
474In this case, any offset from the ESP register will be allowed, and any xmm
475register will be allowed.
476
477Because regular expressions are enclosed with double braces, they are
478visually distinct, and you don't need to use escape characters within the double
479braces like you would in C.  In the rare case that you want to match double
480braces explicitly from the input, you can use something ugly like
481``{{[{][{]}}`` as your pattern.
482
483FileCheck Variables
484~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
485
486It is often useful to match a pattern and then verify that it occurs again
487later in the file.  For codegen tests, this can be useful to allow any register,
488but verify that that register is used consistently later.  To do this,
489:program:`FileCheck` allows named variables to be defined and substituted into
490patterns.  Here is a simple example:
491
492.. code-block:: llvm
493
494   ; CHECK: test5:
495   ; CHECK:    notw	[[REGISTER:%[a-z]+]]
496   ; CHECK:    andw	{{.*}}[[REGISTER]]
497
498The first check line matches a regex ``%[a-z]+`` and captures it into the
499variable ``REGISTER``.  The second line verifies that whatever is in
500``REGISTER`` occurs later in the file after an "``andw``".  :program:`FileCheck`
501variable references are always contained in ``[[ ]]`` pairs, and their names can
502be formed with the regex ``[a-zA-Z_][a-zA-Z0-9_]*``.  If a colon follows the name,
503then it is a definition of the variable; otherwise, it is a use.
504
505:program:`FileCheck` variables can be defined multiple times, and uses always
506get the latest value.  Variables can also be used later on the same line they
507were defined on. For example:
508
509.. code-block:: llvm
510
511    ; CHECK: op [[REG:r[0-9]+]], [[REG]]
512
513Can be useful if you want the operands of ``op`` to be the same register,
514and don't care exactly which register it is.
515
516If ``--enable-var-scope`` is in effect, variables with names that
517start with ``$`` are considered to be global. All others variables are
518local.  All local variables get undefined at the beginning of each
519CHECK-LABEL block. Global variables are not affected by CHECK-LABEL.
520This makes it easier to ensure that individual tests are not affected
521by variables set in preceding tests.
522
523FileCheck Expressions
524~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
525
526Sometimes there's a need to verify output which refers line numbers of the
527match file, e.g. when testing compiler diagnostics.  This introduces a certain
528fragility of the match file structure, as "``CHECK:``" lines contain absolute
529line numbers in the same file, which have to be updated whenever line numbers
530change due to text addition or deletion.
531
532To support this case, FileCheck allows using ``[[@LINE]]``,
533``[[@LINE+<offset>]]``, ``[[@LINE-<offset>]]`` expressions in patterns. These
534expressions expand to a number of the line where a pattern is located (with an
535optional integer offset).
536
537This way match patterns can be put near the relevant test lines and include
538relative line number references, for example:
539
540.. code-block:: c++
541
542   // CHECK: test.cpp:[[@LINE+4]]:6: error: expected ';' after top level declarator
543   // CHECK-NEXT: {{^int a}}
544   // CHECK-NEXT: {{^     \^}}
545   // CHECK-NEXT: {{^     ;}}
546   int a
547
548Matching Newline Characters
549~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
550
551To match newline characters in regular expressions the character class
552``[[:space:]]`` can be used. For example, the following pattern:
553
554.. code-block:: c++
555
556   // CHECK: DW_AT_location [DW_FORM_sec_offset] ([[DLOC:0x[0-9a-f]+]]){{[[:space:]].*}}"intd"
557
558matches output of the form (from llvm-dwarfdump):
559
560.. code-block:: text
561
562       DW_AT_location [DW_FORM_sec_offset]   (0x00000233)
563       DW_AT_name [DW_FORM_strp]  ( .debug_str[0x000000c9] = "intd")
564
565letting us set the :program:`FileCheck` variable ``DLOC`` to the desired value
566``0x00000233``, extracted from the line immediately preceding "``intd``".
567