• Home
  • Line#
  • Scopes#
  • Navigate#
  • Raw
  • Download
1FileCheck - Flexible pattern matching file verifier
2===================================================
3
4SYNOPSIS
5--------
6
7:program:`FileCheck` *match-filename* [*--check-prefix=XXX*] [*--strict-whitespace*]
8
9DESCRIPTION
10-----------
11
12:program:`FileCheck` reads two files (one from standard input, and one
13specified on the command line) and uses one to verify the other.  This
14behavior is particularly useful for the testsuite, which wants to verify that
15the output of some tool (e.g. :program:`llc`) contains the expected information
16(for example, a movsd from esp or whatever is interesting).  This is similar to
17using :program:`grep`, but it is optimized for matching multiple different
18inputs in one file in a specific order.
19
20The ``match-filename`` file specifies the file that contains the patterns to
21match.  The file to verify is read from standard input unless the
22:option:`--input-file` option is used.
23
24OPTIONS
25-------
26
27.. option:: -help
28
29 Print a summary of command line options.
30
31.. option:: --check-prefix prefix
32
33 FileCheck searches the contents of ``match-filename`` for patterns to
34 match.  By default, these patterns are prefixed with "``CHECK:``".
35 If you'd like to use a different prefix (e.g. because the same input
36 file is checking multiple different tool or options), the
37 :option:`--check-prefix` argument allows you to specify one or more
38 prefixes to match. Multiple prefixes are useful for tests which might
39 change for different run options, but most lines remain the same.
40
41.. option:: --check-prefixes prefix1,prefix2,...
42
43 An alias of :option:`--check-prefix` that allows multiple prefixes to be
44 specified as a comma separated list.
45
46.. option:: --input-file filename
47
48  File to check (defaults to stdin).
49
50.. option:: --match-full-lines
51
52 By default, FileCheck allows matches of anywhere on a line. This
53 option will require all positive matches to cover an entire
54 line. Leading and trailing whitespace is ignored, unless
55 :option:`--strict-whitespace` is also specified. (Note: negative
56 matches from ``CHECK-NOT`` are not affected by this option!)
57
58 Passing this option is equivalent to inserting ``{{^ *}}`` or
59 ``{{^}}`` before, and ``{{ *$}}`` or ``{{$}}`` after every positive
60 check pattern.
61
62.. option:: --strict-whitespace
63
64 By default, FileCheck canonicalizes input horizontal whitespace (spaces and
65 tabs) which causes it to ignore these differences (a space will match a tab).
66 The :option:`--strict-whitespace` argument disables this behavior. End-of-line
67 sequences are canonicalized to UNIX-style ``\n`` in all modes.
68
69.. option:: --implicit-check-not check-pattern
70
71  Adds implicit negative checks for the specified patterns between positive
72  checks. The option allows writing stricter tests without stuffing them with
73  ``CHECK-NOT``\ s.
74
75  For example, "``--implicit-check-not warning:``" can be useful when testing
76  diagnostic messages from tools that don't have an option similar to ``clang
77  -verify``. With this option FileCheck will verify that input does not contain
78  warnings not covered by any ``CHECK:`` patterns.
79
80.. option:: -version
81
82 Show the version number of this program.
83
84EXIT STATUS
85-----------
86
87If :program:`FileCheck` verifies that the file matches the expected contents,
88it exits with 0.  Otherwise, if not, or if an error occurs, it will exit with a
89non-zero value.
90
91TUTORIAL
92--------
93
94FileCheck is typically used from LLVM regression tests, being invoked on the RUN
95line of the test.  A simple example of using FileCheck from a RUN line looks
96like this:
97
98.. code-block:: llvm
99
100   ; RUN: llvm-as < %s | llc -march=x86-64 | FileCheck %s
101
102This syntax says to pipe the current file ("``%s``") into ``llvm-as``, pipe
103that into ``llc``, then pipe the output of ``llc`` into ``FileCheck``.  This
104means that FileCheck will be verifying its standard input (the llc output)
105against the filename argument specified (the original ``.ll`` file specified by
106"``%s``").  To see how this works, let's look at the rest of the ``.ll`` file
107(after the RUN line):
108
109.. code-block:: llvm
110
111   define void @sub1(i32* %p, i32 %v) {
112   entry:
113   ; CHECK: sub1:
114   ; CHECK: subl
115           %0 = tail call i32 @llvm.atomic.load.sub.i32.p0i32(i32* %p, i32 %v)
116           ret void
117   }
118
119   define void @inc4(i64* %p) {
120   entry:
121   ; CHECK: inc4:
122   ; CHECK: incq
123           %0 = tail call i64 @llvm.atomic.load.add.i64.p0i64(i64* %p, i64 1)
124           ret void
125   }
126
127Here you can see some "``CHECK:``" lines specified in comments.  Now you can
128see how the file is piped into ``llvm-as``, then ``llc``, and the machine code
129output is what we are verifying.  FileCheck checks the machine code output to
130verify that it matches what the "``CHECK:``" lines specify.
131
132The syntax of the "``CHECK:``" lines is very simple: they are fixed strings that
133must occur in order.  FileCheck defaults to ignoring horizontal whitespace
134differences (e.g. a space is allowed to match a tab) but otherwise, the contents
135of the "``CHECK:``" line is required to match some thing in the test file exactly.
136
137One nice thing about FileCheck (compared to grep) is that it allows merging
138test cases together into logical groups.  For example, because the test above
139is checking for the "``sub1:``" and "``inc4:``" labels, it will not match
140unless there is a "``subl``" in between those labels.  If it existed somewhere
141else in the file, that would not count: "``grep subl``" matches if "``subl``"
142exists anywhere in the file.
143
144The FileCheck -check-prefix option
145~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
146
147The FileCheck :option:`-check-prefix` option allows multiple test
148configurations to be driven from one `.ll` file.  This is useful in many
149circumstances, for example, testing different architectural variants with
150:program:`llc`.  Here's a simple example:
151
152.. code-block:: llvm
153
154   ; RUN: llvm-as < %s | llc -mtriple=i686-apple-darwin9 -mattr=sse41 \
155   ; RUN:              | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=X32
156   ; RUN: llvm-as < %s | llc -mtriple=x86_64-apple-darwin9 -mattr=sse41 \
157   ; RUN:              | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=X64
158
159   define <4 x i32> @pinsrd_1(i32 %s, <4 x i32> %tmp) nounwind {
160           %tmp1 = insertelement <4 x i32>; %tmp, i32 %s, i32 1
161           ret <4 x i32> %tmp1
162   ; X32: pinsrd_1:
163   ; X32:    pinsrd $1, 4(%esp), %xmm0
164
165   ; X64: pinsrd_1:
166   ; X64:    pinsrd $1, %edi, %xmm0
167   }
168
169In this case, we're testing that we get the expected code generation with
170both 32-bit and 64-bit code generation.
171
172The "CHECK-NEXT:" directive
173~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
174
175Sometimes you want to match lines and would like to verify that matches
176happen on exactly consecutive lines with no other lines in between them.  In
177this case, you can use "``CHECK:``" and "``CHECK-NEXT:``" directives to specify
178this.  If you specified a custom check prefix, just use "``<PREFIX>-NEXT:``".
179For example, something like this works as you'd expect:
180
181.. code-block:: llvm
182
183   define void @t2(<2 x double>* %r, <2 x double>* %A, double %B) {
184 	%tmp3 = load <2 x double>* %A, align 16
185 	%tmp7 = insertelement <2 x double> undef, double %B, i32 0
186 	%tmp9 = shufflevector <2 x double> %tmp3,
187                               <2 x double> %tmp7,
188                               <2 x i32> < i32 0, i32 2 >
189 	store <2 x double> %tmp9, <2 x double>* %r, align 16
190 	ret void
191
192   ; CHECK:          t2:
193   ; CHECK: 	        movl	8(%esp), %eax
194   ; CHECK-NEXT: 	movapd	(%eax), %xmm0
195   ; CHECK-NEXT: 	movhpd	12(%esp), %xmm0
196   ; CHECK-NEXT: 	movl	4(%esp), %eax
197   ; CHECK-NEXT: 	movapd	%xmm0, (%eax)
198   ; CHECK-NEXT: 	ret
199   }
200
201"``CHECK-NEXT:``" directives reject the input unless there is exactly one
202newline between it and the previous directive.  A "``CHECK-NEXT:``" cannot be
203the first directive in a file.
204
205The "CHECK-SAME:" directive
206~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
207
208Sometimes you want to match lines and would like to verify that matches happen
209on the same line as the previous match.  In this case, you can use "``CHECK:``"
210and "``CHECK-SAME:``" directives to specify this.  If you specified a custom
211check prefix, just use "``<PREFIX>-SAME:``".
212
213"``CHECK-SAME:``" is particularly powerful in conjunction with "``CHECK-NOT:``"
214(described below).
215
216For example, the following works like you'd expect:
217
218.. code-block:: llvm
219
220   !0 = !DILocation(line: 5, scope: !1, inlinedAt: !2)
221
222   ; CHECK:       !DILocation(line: 5,
223   ; CHECK-NOT:               column:
224   ; CHECK-SAME:              scope: ![[SCOPE:[0-9]+]]
225
226"``CHECK-SAME:``" directives reject the input if there are any newlines between
227it and the previous directive.  A "``CHECK-SAME:``" cannot be the first
228directive in a file.
229
230The "CHECK-NOT:" directive
231~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
232
233The "``CHECK-NOT:``" directive is used to verify that a string doesn't occur
234between two matches (or before the first match, or after the last match).  For
235example, to verify that a load is removed by a transformation, a test like this
236can be used:
237
238.. code-block:: llvm
239
240   define i8 @coerce_offset0(i32 %V, i32* %P) {
241     store i32 %V, i32* %P
242
243     %P2 = bitcast i32* %P to i8*
244     %P3 = getelementptr i8* %P2, i32 2
245
246     %A = load i8* %P3
247     ret i8 %A
248   ; CHECK: @coerce_offset0
249   ; CHECK-NOT: load
250   ; CHECK: ret i8
251   }
252
253The "CHECK-DAG:" directive
254~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
255
256If it's necessary to match strings that don't occur in a strictly sequential
257order, "``CHECK-DAG:``" could be used to verify them between two matches (or
258before the first match, or after the last match). For example, clang emits
259vtable globals in reverse order. Using ``CHECK-DAG:``, we can keep the checks
260in the natural order:
261
262.. code-block:: c++
263
264    // RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -emit-llvm -o - | FileCheck %s
265
266    struct Foo { virtual void method(); };
267    Foo f;  // emit vtable
268    // CHECK-DAG: @_ZTV3Foo =
269
270    struct Bar { virtual void method(); };
271    Bar b;
272    // CHECK-DAG: @_ZTV3Bar =
273
274``CHECK-NOT:`` directives could be mixed with ``CHECK-DAG:`` directives to
275exclude strings between the surrounding ``CHECK-DAG:`` directives. As a result,
276the surrounding ``CHECK-DAG:`` directives cannot be reordered, i.e. all
277occurrences matching ``CHECK-DAG:`` before ``CHECK-NOT:`` must not fall behind
278occurrences matching ``CHECK-DAG:`` after ``CHECK-NOT:``. For example,
279
280.. code-block:: llvm
281
282   ; CHECK-DAG: BEFORE
283   ; CHECK-NOT: NOT
284   ; CHECK-DAG: AFTER
285
286This case will reject input strings where ``BEFORE`` occurs after ``AFTER``.
287
288With captured variables, ``CHECK-DAG:`` is able to match valid topological
289orderings of a DAG with edges from the definition of a variable to its use.
290It's useful, e.g., when your test cases need to match different output
291sequences from the instruction scheduler. For example,
292
293.. code-block:: llvm
294
295   ; CHECK-DAG: add [[REG1:r[0-9]+]], r1, r2
296   ; CHECK-DAG: add [[REG2:r[0-9]+]], r3, r4
297   ; CHECK:     mul r5, [[REG1]], [[REG2]]
298
299In this case, any order of that two ``add`` instructions will be allowed.
300
301If you are defining `and` using variables in the same ``CHECK-DAG:`` block,
302be aware that the definition rule can match `after` its use.
303
304So, for instance, the code below will pass:
305
306.. code-block:: llvm
307
308  ; CHECK-DAG: vmov.32 [[REG2:d[0-9]+]][0]
309  ; CHECK-DAG: vmov.32 [[REG2]][1]
310  vmov.32 d0[1]
311  vmov.32 d0[0]
312
313While this other code, will not:
314
315.. code-block:: llvm
316
317  ; CHECK-DAG: vmov.32 [[REG2:d[0-9]+]][0]
318  ; CHECK-DAG: vmov.32 [[REG2]][1]
319  vmov.32 d1[1]
320  vmov.32 d0[0]
321
322While this can be very useful, it's also dangerous, because in the case of
323register sequence, you must have a strong order (read before write, copy before
324use, etc). If the definition your test is looking for doesn't match (because
325of a bug in the compiler), it may match further away from the use, and mask
326real bugs away.
327
328In those cases, to enforce the order, use a non-DAG directive between DAG-blocks.
329
330The "CHECK-LABEL:" directive
331~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
332
333Sometimes in a file containing multiple tests divided into logical blocks, one
334or more ``CHECK:`` directives may inadvertently succeed by matching lines in a
335later block. While an error will usually eventually be generated, the check
336flagged as causing the error may not actually bear any relationship to the
337actual source of the problem.
338
339In order to produce better error messages in these cases, the "``CHECK-LABEL:``"
340directive can be used. It is treated identically to a normal ``CHECK``
341directive except that FileCheck makes an additional assumption that a line
342matched by the directive cannot also be matched by any other check present in
343``match-filename``; this is intended to be used for lines containing labels or
344other unique identifiers. Conceptually, the presence of ``CHECK-LABEL`` divides
345the input stream into separate blocks, each of which is processed independently,
346preventing a ``CHECK:`` directive in one block matching a line in another block.
347For example,
348
349.. code-block:: llvm
350
351  define %struct.C* @C_ctor_base(%struct.C* %this, i32 %x) {
352  entry:
353  ; CHECK-LABEL: C_ctor_base:
354  ; CHECK: mov [[SAVETHIS:r[0-9]+]], r0
355  ; CHECK: bl A_ctor_base
356  ; CHECK: mov r0, [[SAVETHIS]]
357    %0 = bitcast %struct.C* %this to %struct.A*
358    %call = tail call %struct.A* @A_ctor_base(%struct.A* %0)
359    %1 = bitcast %struct.C* %this to %struct.B*
360    %call2 = tail call %struct.B* @B_ctor_base(%struct.B* %1, i32 %x)
361    ret %struct.C* %this
362  }
363
364  define %struct.D* @D_ctor_base(%struct.D* %this, i32 %x) {
365  entry:
366  ; CHECK-LABEL: D_ctor_base:
367
368The use of ``CHECK-LABEL:`` directives in this case ensures that the three
369``CHECK:`` directives only accept lines corresponding to the body of the
370``@C_ctor_base`` function, even if the patterns match lines found later in
371the file. Furthermore, if one of these three ``CHECK:`` directives fail,
372FileCheck will recover by continuing to the next block, allowing multiple test
373failures to be detected in a single invocation.
374
375There is no requirement that ``CHECK-LABEL:`` directives contain strings that
376correspond to actual syntactic labels in a source or output language: they must
377simply uniquely match a single line in the file being verified.
378
379``CHECK-LABEL:`` directives cannot contain variable definitions or uses.
380
381FileCheck Pattern Matching Syntax
382~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
383
384All FileCheck directives take a pattern to match.
385For most uses of FileCheck, fixed string matching is perfectly sufficient.  For
386some things, a more flexible form of matching is desired.  To support this,
387FileCheck allows you to specify regular expressions in matching strings,
388surrounded by double braces: ``{{yourregex}}``.  Because we want to use fixed
389string matching for a majority of what we do, FileCheck has been designed to
390support mixing and matching fixed string matching with regular expressions.
391This allows you to write things like this:
392
393.. code-block:: llvm
394
395   ; CHECK: movhpd	{{[0-9]+}}(%esp), {{%xmm[0-7]}}
396
397In this case, any offset from the ESP register will be allowed, and any xmm
398register will be allowed.
399
400Because regular expressions are enclosed with double braces, they are
401visually distinct, and you don't need to use escape characters within the double
402braces like you would in C.  In the rare case that you want to match double
403braces explicitly from the input, you can use something ugly like
404``{{[{][{]}}`` as your pattern.
405
406FileCheck Variables
407~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
408
409It is often useful to match a pattern and then verify that it occurs again
410later in the file.  For codegen tests, this can be useful to allow any register,
411but verify that that register is used consistently later.  To do this,
412:program:`FileCheck` allows named variables to be defined and substituted into
413patterns.  Here is a simple example:
414
415.. code-block:: llvm
416
417   ; CHECK: test5:
418   ; CHECK:    notw	[[REGISTER:%[a-z]+]]
419   ; CHECK:    andw	{{.*}}[[REGISTER]]
420
421The first check line matches a regex ``%[a-z]+`` and captures it into the
422variable ``REGISTER``.  The second line verifies that whatever is in
423``REGISTER`` occurs later in the file after an "``andw``".  :program:`FileCheck`
424variable references are always contained in ``[[ ]]`` pairs, and their names can
425be formed with the regex ``[a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z0-9]*``.  If a colon follows the name,
426then it is a definition of the variable; otherwise, it is a use.
427
428:program:`FileCheck` variables can be defined multiple times, and uses always
429get the latest value.  Variables can also be used later on the same line they
430were defined on. For example:
431
432.. code-block:: llvm
433
434    ; CHECK: op [[REG:r[0-9]+]], [[REG]]
435
436Can be useful if you want the operands of ``op`` to be the same register,
437and don't care exactly which register it is.
438
439FileCheck Expressions
440~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
441
442Sometimes there's a need to verify output which refers line numbers of the
443match file, e.g. when testing compiler diagnostics.  This introduces a certain
444fragility of the match file structure, as "``CHECK:``" lines contain absolute
445line numbers in the same file, which have to be updated whenever line numbers
446change due to text addition or deletion.
447
448To support this case, FileCheck allows using ``[[@LINE]]``,
449``[[@LINE+<offset>]]``, ``[[@LINE-<offset>]]`` expressions in patterns. These
450expressions expand to a number of the line where a pattern is located (with an
451optional integer offset).
452
453This way match patterns can be put near the relevant test lines and include
454relative line number references, for example:
455
456.. code-block:: c++
457
458   // CHECK: test.cpp:[[@LINE+4]]:6: error: expected ';' after top level declarator
459   // CHECK-NEXT: {{^int a}}
460   // CHECK-NEXT: {{^     \^}}
461   // CHECK-NEXT: {{^     ;}}
462   int a
463
464Matching Newline Characters
465~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
466
467To match newline characters in regular expressions the character class
468``[[:space:]]`` can be used. For example, the following pattern:
469
470.. code-block:: c++
471
472   // CHECK: DW_AT_location [DW_FORM_sec_offset] ([[DLOC:0x[0-9a-f]+]]){{[[:space:]].*}}"intd"
473
474matches output of the form (from llvm-dwarfdump):
475
476.. code-block:: llvm
477
478       DW_AT_location [DW_FORM_sec_offset]   (0x00000233)
479       DW_AT_name [DW_FORM_strp]  ( .debug_str[0x000000c9] = "intd")
480
481letting us set the :program:`FileCheck` variable ``DLOC`` to the desired value
482``0x00000233``, extracted from the line immediately preceding "``intd``".
483