1The guidelines in this file are the ideals; it's better to send a 2not-fully-following-guidelines patch than no patch at all, though. We 3can always polish it up. 4 5Mailing list 6=== 7 8The D-Bus mailing list is message-bus-list@freedesktop.org; discussion 9of patches, etc. should go there. 10 11Security 12=== 13 14Most of D-Bus is security sensitive. Guidelines related to that: 15 16 - avoid memcpy(), sprintf(), strlen(), snprintf, strlcat(), 17 strstr(), strtok(), or any of this stuff. Use DBusString. 18 If DBusString doesn't have the feature you need, add it 19 to DBusString. 20 21 There are some exceptions, for example 22 if your strings are just used to index a hash table 23 and you don't do any parsing/modification of them, perhaps 24 DBusString is wasteful and wouldn't help much. But definitely 25 if you're doing any parsing, reallocation, etc. use DBusString. 26 27 - do not include system headers outside of dbus-memory.c, 28 dbus-sysdeps.c, and other places where they are already 29 included. This gives us one place to audit all external 30 dependencies on features in libc, etc. 31 32 - do not use libc features that are "complicated" 33 and may contain security holes. For example, you probably shouldn't 34 try to use regcomp() to compile an untrusted regular expression. 35 Regular expressions are just too complicated, and there are many 36 different libc's out there. 37 38 - we need to design the message bus daemon (and any similar features) 39 to use limited privileges, run in a chroot jail, and so on. 40 41http://vsftpd.beasts.org/ has other good security suggestions. 42 43Coding Style 44=== 45 46 - The C library uses GNU coding conventions, with GLib-like 47 extensions (e.g. lining up function arguments). The 48 Qt wrapper uses KDE coding conventions. 49 50 - Write docs for all non-static functions and structs and so on. try 51 "doxygen Doxyfile" prior to commit and be sure there are no 52 warnings printed. 53 54 - All external interfaces (network protocols, file formats, etc.) 55 should have documented specifications sufficient to allow an 56 alternative implementation to be written. Our implementation should 57 be strict about specification compliance (should not for example 58 heuristically parse a file and accept not-well-formed 59 data). Avoiding heuristics is also important for security reasons; 60 if it looks funny, ignore it (or exit, or disconnect). 61 62Making a release 63=== 64 65To make a release of D-Bus, do the following: 66 67 - check out a fresh copy from CVS 68 69 - verify that the libtool versioning/library soname is 70 changed if it needs to be, or not changed if not 71 72 - update the file NEWS based on the ChangeLog 73 74 - update the AUTHORS file based on the ChangeLog 75 76 - add a ChangeLog entry containing the version number 77 you're releasing ("Released 0.3" or something) 78 so people can see which changes were before and after 79 a given release. 80 81 - The version number should have major.minor.micro even 82 if micro is 0, i.e. "1.0.0" and "1.2.0" not "1.0"/"1.2" 83 84 - "make distcheck" (DO NOT just "make dist" - pass the check!) 85 86 - if make distcheck fails, fix it. 87 88 - once distcheck succeeds, "cvs commit" 89 90 - if someone else made changes and the commit fails, 91 you have to "cvs up" and run "make distcheck" again 92 93 - once the commit succeeds, "cvs tag DBUS_X_Y_Z" where 94 X_Y_Z map to version X.Y.Z 95 96 - bump the version number up in configure.in, and commit 97 it. Make sure you do this *after* tagging the previous 98 release! The idea is that CVS has a newer version number 99 than anything released. 100 101 - scp your tarball to freedesktop.org server and copy it 102 to /srv/dbus.freedesktop.org/www/releases. This should 103 be possible if you're in group "dbus" 104 105 - update the wiki page http://www.freedesktop.org/Software/dbus by 106 adding the new release under the Download heading. Then, cut the 107 link and changelog for the previous that was there. 108 109 - update the wiki page 110 http://www.freedesktop.org/Software/DbusReleaseArchive pasting the 111 previous release. Note that bullet points for each of the changelog 112 items must be indented three more spaces to conform to the 113 formatting of the other releases there. 114 115 - post to dbus@lists.freedesktop.org announcing the release. 116 117 118After making a ".0" stable release 119=== 120 121After releasing, when you increment the version number in CVS, also 122move the ChangeLog to ChangeLog.pre-X-Y where X-Y is what you just 123released, e.g. ChangeLog.pre-1-0. Then create and cvs add a new empty 124ChangeLog. The last entry in ChangeLog.pre-1-0 should be the one about 125"Released 1.0". 126 127Add ChangeLog.pre-X-Y to EXTRA_DIST in Makefile.am. 128 129We create a branch for each stable release; sometimes the branch is 130not done immediately, instead it's possible to wait until someone has 131a not-suitable-for-stable change they want to make and then branch to 132allow committing that change. 133 134The branch name should be DBUS_X_Y_BRANCH which is a branch that has 135releases versioned X.Y.Z 136 137To branch, tag HEAD with DBUS_X_Y_BRANCHPOINT: 138 cvs tag DBUS_X_Y_BRANCHPOINT 139then create the branch from that tag: 140 cvs rtag -b -r DBUS_X_Y_BRANCHPOINT DBUS_X_Y_BRANCH dbus 141 142Note that DBUS_X_Y_BRANCHPOINT may not tag the same revision as the 143DBUS_X_Y_0 release, since we may not branch immediately. 144 145Environment variables 146=== 147 148These are the environment variables that are used by the D-Bus client library 149 150DBUS_VERBOSE=1 151Turns on printing verbose messages. This only works if D-Bus has been 152compiled with --enable-verbose-mode 153 154DBUS_MALLOC_FAIL_NTH=n 155Can be set to a number, causing every nth call to dbus_alloc or 156dbus_realloc to fail. This only works if D-Bus has been compiled with 157--enable-tests. 158 159DBUS_MALLOC_FAIL_GREATER_THAN=n 160Can be set to a number, causing every call to dbus_alloc or 161dbus_realloc to fail if the number of bytes to be allocated is greater 162than the specified number. This only works if D-Bus has been compiled with 163--enable-tests. 164 165DBUS_TEST_MALLOC_FAILURES=n 166Many of the D-Bus tests will run over and over, once for each malloc 167involved in the test. Each run will fail a different malloc, plus some 168number of mallocs following that malloc (because a fair number of bugs 169only happen if two or more mallocs fail in a row, e.g. error recovery 170that itself involves malloc). This env variable sets the number of 171mallocs to fail. 172Here's why you care: If set to 0, then the malloc checking is skipped, 173which makes the test suite a heck of a lot faster. Just run with this 174env variable unset before you commit. 175 176Tests 177=== 178 179These are the test programs that are built if dbus is compiled using 180--enable-tests. 181 182dbus/dbus-test 183This is the main unit test program that tests all aspects of the D-Bus 184client library. 185 186dbus/bus-test 187This it the unit test program for the message bus. 188 189test/break-loader 190A test that tries to break the message loader by passing it randomly 191created invalid messages. 192 193"make check" runs all the deterministic test programs (i.e. not break-loader). 194 195"make check-coverage" is available if you configure with --enable-gcov and 196gives a complete report on test suite coverage. You can also run 197"test/decode-gcov foo.c" on any source file to get annotated source, 198after running make check with a gcov-enabled tree. 199 200Patches 201=== 202 203Please file them at http://bugzilla.freedesktop.org under component 204dbus, and also post to the mailing list for discussion. The commit 205rules are: 206 207 - for fixes that don't affect API or protocol, they can be committed 208 if any one qualified reviewer other than patch author 209 reviews and approves 210 211 - for fixes that do affect API or protocol, two people 212 in the reviewer group have to review and approve the commit, and 213 posting to the list is definitely mandatory 214 215 - if there's a live unresolved controversy about a change, 216 don't commit it while the argument is still raging. 217 218 - regardless of reviews, to commit a patch: 219 - make check must pass 220 - the test suite must be extended to cover the new code 221 as much as reasonably feasible 222 - the patch has to follow the portability, security, and 223 style guidelines 224 - the patch should as much as reasonable do one thing, 225 not many unrelated changes 226 No reviewer should approve a patch without these attributes, and 227 failure on these points is grounds for reverting the patch. 228 229The reviewer group that can approve patches: Havoc Pennington, Michael 230Meeks, Alex Larsson, Zack Rusin, Joe Shaw, Mikael Hallendal, Richard 231Hult, Owen Fraser-Green, Olivier Andrieu, Colin Walters, Thiago 232Macieira, John Palmieri. 233 234 235