Searched refs:m_nextBreakablePosition (Results 1 – 3 of 3) sorted by relevance
40 , m_nextBreakablePosition(-1) in InlineIterator()48 , m_nextBreakablePosition(-1) in InlineIterator()63 m_nextBreakablePosition = nextBreak;92 int m_nextBreakablePosition; variable
1835 int nextBreakable = resolver.position().m_nextBreakablePosition; in findNextLineBreak()
34937 … Rename InlineIterator::nextBreakablePosition to m_nextBreakablePosition to match modern style34940 All of these m_nextBreakablePosition = -1 could probably be replaced with34942 m_nextBreakablePosition is just a cached value which should be cleared