1================================= 2LLVM Testing Infrastructure Guide 3================================= 4 5.. contents:: 6 :local: 7 8.. toctree:: 9 :hidden: 10 11 TestSuiteMakefileGuide 12 13Overview 14======== 15 16This document is the reference manual for the LLVM testing 17infrastructure. It documents the structure of the LLVM testing 18infrastructure, the tools needed to use it, and how to add and run 19tests. 20 21Requirements 22============ 23 24In order to use the LLVM testing infrastructure, you will need all of 25the software required to build LLVM, as well as 26`Python <http://python.org>`_ 2.4 or later. 27 28LLVM testing infrastructure organization 29======================================== 30 31The LLVM testing infrastructure contains two major categories of tests: 32regression tests and whole programs. The regression tests are contained 33inside the LLVM repository itself under ``llvm/test`` and are expected 34to always pass -- they should be run before every commit. 35 36The whole programs tests are referred to as the "LLVM test suite" (or 37"test-suite") and are in the ``test-suite`` module in subversion. For 38historical reasons, these tests are also referred to as the "nightly 39tests" in places, which is less ambiguous than "test-suite" and remains 40in use although we run them much more often than nightly. 41 42Regression tests 43---------------- 44 45The regression tests are small pieces of code that test a specific 46feature of LLVM or trigger a specific bug in LLVM. The language they are 47written in depends on the part of LLVM being tested. These tests are driven by 48the :doc:`Lit <CommandGuide/lit>` testing tool (which is part of LLVM), and 49are located in the ``llvm/test`` directory. 50 51Typically when a bug is found in LLVM, a regression test containing just 52enough code to reproduce the problem should be written and placed 53somewhere underneath this directory. For example, it can be a small 54piece of LLVM IR distilled from an actual application or benchmark. 55 56``test-suite`` 57-------------- 58 59The test suite contains whole programs, which are pieces of code which 60can be compiled and linked into a stand-alone program that can be 61executed. These programs are generally written in high level languages 62such as C or C++. 63 64These programs are compiled using a user specified compiler and set of 65flags, and then executed to capture the program output and timing 66information. The output of these programs is compared to a reference 67output to ensure that the program is being compiled correctly. 68 69In addition to compiling and executing programs, whole program tests 70serve as a way of benchmarking LLVM performance, both in terms of the 71efficiency of the programs generated as well as the speed with which 72LLVM compiles, optimizes, and generates code. 73 74The test-suite is located in the ``test-suite`` Subversion module. 75 76Debugging Information tests 77--------------------------- 78 79The test suite contains tests to check quality of debugging information. 80The test are written in C based languages or in LLVM assembly language. 81 82These tests are compiled and run under a debugger. The debugger output 83is checked to validate of debugging information. See README.txt in the 84test suite for more information . This test suite is located in the 85``debuginfo-tests`` Subversion module. 86 87Quick start 88=========== 89 90The tests are located in two separate Subversion modules. The 91regressions tests are in the main "llvm" module under the directory 92``llvm/test`` (so you get these tests for free with the main LLVM tree). 93Use ``make check-all`` to run the regression tests after building LLVM. 94 95The more comprehensive test suite that includes whole programs in C and C++ 96is in the ``test-suite`` module. See :ref:`test-suite Quickstart 97<test-suite-quickstart>` for more information on running these tests. 98 99Regression tests 100---------------- 101 102To run all of the LLVM regression tests, use the master Makefile in the 103``llvm/test`` directory. LLVM Makefiles require GNU Make (read the :doc:`LLVM 104Makefile Guide <MakefileGuide>` for more details): 105 106.. code-block:: bash 107 108 % make -C llvm/test 109 110or: 111 112.. code-block:: bash 113 114 % make check 115 116If you have `Clang <http://clang.llvm.org/>`_ checked out and built, you 117can run the LLVM and Clang tests simultaneously using: 118 119.. code-block:: bash 120 121 % make check-all 122 123To run the tests with Valgrind (Memcheck by default), just append 124``VG=1`` to the commands above, e.g.: 125 126.. code-block:: bash 127 128 % make check VG=1 129 130To run individual tests or subsets of tests, you can use the ``llvm-lit`` 131script which is built as part of LLVM. For example, to run the 132``Integer/BitPacked.ll`` test by itself you can run: 133 134.. code-block:: bash 135 136 % llvm-lit ~/llvm/test/Integer/BitPacked.ll 137 138or to run all of the ARM CodeGen tests: 139 140.. code-block:: bash 141 142 % llvm-lit ~/llvm/test/CodeGen/ARM 143 144For more information on using the :program:`lit` tool, see ``llvm-lit --help`` 145or the :doc:`lit man page <CommandGuide/lit>`. 146 147Debugging Information tests 148--------------------------- 149 150To run debugging information tests simply checkout the tests inside 151clang/test directory. 152 153.. code-block:: bash 154 155 % cd clang/test 156 % svn co http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/debuginfo-tests/trunk debuginfo-tests 157 158These tests are already set up to run as part of clang regression tests. 159 160Regression test structure 161========================= 162 163The LLVM regression tests are driven by :program:`lit` and are located in the 164``llvm/test`` directory. 165 166This directory contains a large array of small tests that exercise 167various features of LLVM and to ensure that regressions do not occur. 168The directory is broken into several sub-directories, each focused on a 169particular area of LLVM. 170 171Writing new regression tests 172---------------------------- 173 174The regression test structure is very simple, but does require some 175information to be set. This information is gathered via ``configure`` 176and is written to a file, ``test/lit.site.cfg`` in the build directory. 177The ``llvm/test`` Makefile does this work for you. 178 179In order for the regression tests to work, each directory of tests must 180have a ``lit.local.cfg`` file. :program:`lit` looks for this file to determine 181how to run the tests. This file is just Python code and thus is very 182flexible, but we've standardized it for the LLVM regression tests. If 183you're adding a directory of tests, just copy ``lit.local.cfg`` from 184another directory to get running. The standard ``lit.local.cfg`` simply 185specifies which files to look in for tests. Any directory that contains 186only directories does not need the ``lit.local.cfg`` file. Read the :doc:`Lit 187documentation <CommandGuide/lit>` for more information. 188 189Each test file must contain lines starting with "RUN:" that tell :program:`lit` 190how to run it. If there are no RUN lines, :program:`lit` will issue an error 191while running a test. 192 193RUN lines are specified in the comments of the test program using the 194keyword ``RUN`` followed by a colon, and lastly the command (pipeline) 195to execute. Together, these lines form the "script" that :program:`lit` 196executes to run the test case. The syntax of the RUN lines is similar to a 197shell's syntax for pipelines including I/O redirection and variable 198substitution. However, even though these lines may *look* like a shell 199script, they are not. RUN lines are interpreted by :program:`lit`. 200Consequently, the syntax differs from shell in a few ways. You can specify 201as many RUN lines as needed. 202 203:program:`lit` performs substitution on each RUN line to replace LLVM tool names 204with the full paths to the executable built for each tool (in 205``$(LLVM_OBJ_ROOT)/$(BuildMode)/bin)``. This ensures that :program:`lit` does 206not invoke any stray LLVM tools in the user's path during testing. 207 208Each RUN line is executed on its own, distinct from other lines unless 209its last character is ``\``. This continuation character causes the RUN 210line to be concatenated with the next one. In this way you can build up 211long pipelines of commands without making huge line lengths. The lines 212ending in ``\`` are concatenated until a RUN line that doesn't end in 213``\`` is found. This concatenated set of RUN lines then constitutes one 214execution. :program:`lit` will substitute variables and arrange for the pipeline 215to be executed. If any process in the pipeline fails, the entire line (and 216test case) fails too. 217 218Below is an example of legal RUN lines in a ``.ll`` file: 219 220.. code-block:: llvm 221 222 ; RUN: llvm-as < %s | llvm-dis > %t1 223 ; RUN: llvm-dis < %s.bc-13 > %t2 224 ; RUN: diff %t1 %t2 225 226As with a Unix shell, the RUN lines permit pipelines and I/O 227redirection to be used. 228 229There are some quoting rules that you must pay attention to when writing 230your RUN lines. In general nothing needs to be quoted. :program:`lit` won't 231strip off any quote characters so they will get passed to the invoked program. 232To avoid this use curly braces to tell :program:`lit` that it should treat 233everything enclosed as one value. 234 235In general, you should strive to keep your RUN lines as simple as possible, 236using them only to run tools that generate textual output you can then examine. 237The recommended way to examine output to figure out if the test passes is using 238the :doc:`FileCheck tool <CommandGuide/FileCheck>`. *[The usage of grep in RUN 239lines is deprecated - please do not send or commit patches that use it.]* 240 241Fragile tests 242------------- 243 244It is easy to write a fragile test that would fail spuriously if the tool being 245tested outputs a full path to the input file. For example, :program:`opt` by 246default outputs a ``ModuleID``: 247 248.. code-block:: console 249 250 $ cat example.ll 251 define i32 @main() nounwind { 252 ret i32 0 253 } 254 255 $ opt -S /path/to/example.ll 256 ; ModuleID = '/path/to/example.ll' 257 258 define i32 @main() nounwind { 259 ret i32 0 260 } 261 262``ModuleID`` can unexpetedly match against ``CHECK`` lines. For example: 263 264.. code-block:: llvm 265 266 ; RUN: opt -S %s | FileCheck 267 268 define i32 @main() nounwind { 269 ; CHECK-NOT: load 270 ret i32 0 271 } 272 273This test will fail if placed into a ``download`` directory. 274 275To make your tests robust, always use ``opt ... < %s`` in the RUN line. 276:program:`opt` does not output a ``ModuleID`` when input comes from stdin. 277 278Platform-Specific Tests 279----------------------- 280 281Whenever adding tests that require the knowledge of a specific platform, 282either related to code generated, specific output or back-end features, 283you must make sure to isolate the features, so that buildbots that 284run on different architectures (and don't even compile all back-ends), 285don't fail. 286 287The first problem is to check for target-specific output, for example sizes 288of structures, paths and architecture names, for example: 289 290* Tests containing Windows paths will fail on Linux and vice-versa. 291* Tests that check for ``x86_64`` somewhere in the text will fail anywhere else. 292* Tests where the debug information calculates the size of types and structures. 293 294Also, if the test rely on any behaviour that is coded in any back-end, it must 295go in its own directory. So, for instance, code generator tests for ARM go 296into ``test/CodeGen/ARM`` and so on. Those directories contain a special 297``lit`` configuration file that ensure all tests in that directory will 298only run if a specific back-end is compiled and available. 299 300For instance, on ``test/CodeGen/ARM``, the ``lit.local.cfg`` is: 301 302.. code-block:: python 303 304 config.suffixes = ['.ll', '.c', '.cpp', '.test'] 305 targets = set(config.root.targets_to_build.split()) 306 if not 'ARM' in targets: 307 config.unsupported = True 308 309Other platform-specific tests are those that depend on a specific feature 310of a specific sub-architecture, for example only to Intel chips that support ``AVX2``. 311 312For instance, ``test/CodeGen/X86/psubus.ll`` tests three sub-architecture 313variants: 314 315.. code-block:: llvm 316 317 ; RUN: llc -mcpu=core2 < %s | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=SSE2 318 ; RUN: llc -mcpu=corei7-avx < %s | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=AVX1 319 ; RUN: llc -mcpu=core-avx2 < %s | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=AVX2 320 321And the checks are different: 322 323.. code-block:: llvm 324 325 ; SSE2: @test1 326 ; SSE2: psubusw LCPI0_0(%rip), %xmm0 327 ; AVX1: @test1 328 ; AVX1: vpsubusw LCPI0_0(%rip), %xmm0, %xmm0 329 ; AVX2: @test1 330 ; AVX2: vpsubusw LCPI0_0(%rip), %xmm0, %xmm0 331 332So, if you're testing for a behaviour that you know is platform-specific or 333depends on special features of sub-architectures, you must add the specific 334triple, test with the specific FileCheck and put it into the specific 335directory that will filter out all other architectures. 336 337 338Variables and substitutions 339--------------------------- 340 341With a RUN line there are a number of substitutions that are permitted. 342To make a substitution just write the variable's name preceded by a ``$``. 343Additionally, for compatibility reasons with previous versions of the 344test library, certain names can be accessed with an alternate syntax: a 345% prefix. These alternates are deprecated and may go away in a future 346version. 347 348Here are the available variable names. The alternate syntax is listed in 349parentheses. 350 351``$test`` (``%s``) 352 The full path to the test case's source. This is suitable for passing on 353 the command line as the input to an LLVM tool. 354 355``%(line)``, ``%(line+<number>)``, ``%(line-<number>)`` 356 The number of the line where this variable is used, with an optional 357 integer offset. This can be used in tests with multiple RUN lines, 358 which reference test file's line numbers. 359 360``$srcdir`` 361 The source directory from where the ``make check`` was run. 362 363``objdir`` 364 The object directory that corresponds to the ``$srcdir``. 365 366``subdir`` 367 A partial path from the ``test`` directory that contains the 368 sub-directory that contains the test source being executed. 369 370``srcroot`` 371 The root directory of the LLVM src tree. 372 373``objroot`` 374 The root directory of the LLVM object tree. This could be the same as 375 the srcroot. 376 377``path`` 378 The path to the directory that contains the test case source. This is 379 for locating any supporting files that are not generated by the test, 380 but used by the test. 381 382``tmp`` 383 The path to a temporary file name that could be used for this test case. 384 The file name won't conflict with other test cases. You can append to it 385 if you need multiple temporaries. This is useful as the destination of 386 some redirected output. 387 388``target_triplet`` (``%target_triplet``) 389 The target triplet that corresponds to the current host machine (the one 390 running the test cases). This should probably be called "host". 391 392``link`` (``%link``) 393 This full link command used to link LLVM executables. This has all the 394 configured ``-I``, ``-L`` and ``-l`` options. 395 396``shlibext`` (``%shlibext``) 397 The suffix for the host platforms shared library (DLL) files. This 398 includes the period as the first character. 399 400To add more variables, look at ``test/lit.cfg``. 401 402Other Features 403-------------- 404 405To make RUN line writing easier, there are several helper scripts and programs 406in the ``llvm/test/Scripts`` directory. This directory is in the PATH 407when running tests, so you can just call these scripts using their name. 408For example: 409 410``ignore`` 411 This script runs its arguments and then always returns 0. This is useful 412 in cases where the test needs to cause a tool to generate an error (e.g. 413 to check the error output). However, any program in a pipeline that 414 returns a non-zero result will cause the test to fail. This script 415 overcomes that issue and nicely documents that the test case is 416 purposefully ignoring the result code of the tool 417``not`` 418 This script runs its arguments and then inverts the result code from it. 419 Zero result codes become 1. Non-zero result codes become 0. 420 421Sometimes it is necessary to mark a test case as "expected fail" or 422XFAIL. You can easily mark a test as XFAIL just by including ``XFAIL:`` 423on a line near the top of the file. This signals that the test case 424should succeed if the test fails. Such test cases are counted separately 425by the testing tool. To specify an expected fail, use the XFAIL keyword 426in the comments of the test program followed by a colon and one or more 427failure patterns. Each failure pattern can be either ``*`` (to specify 428fail everywhere), or a part of a target triple (indicating the test 429should fail on that platform), or the name of a configurable feature 430(for example, ``loadable_module``). If there is a match, the test is 431expected to fail. If not, the test is expected to succeed. To XFAIL 432everywhere just specify ``XFAIL: *``. Here is an example of an ``XFAIL`` 433line: 434 435.. code-block:: llvm 436 437 ; XFAIL: darwin,sun 438 439To make the output more useful, :program:`lit` will scan 440the lines of the test case for ones that contain a pattern that matches 441``PR[0-9]+``. This is the syntax for specifying a PR (Problem Report) number 442that is related to the test case. The number after "PR" specifies the 443LLVM bugzilla number. When a PR number is specified, it will be used in 444the pass/fail reporting. This is useful to quickly get some context when 445a test fails. 446 447Finally, any line that contains "END." will cause the special 448interpretation of lines to terminate. This is generally done right after 449the last RUN: line. This has two side effects: 450 451(a) it prevents special interpretation of lines that are part of the test 452 program, not the instructions to the test case, and 453 454(b) it speeds things up for really big test cases by avoiding 455 interpretation of the remainder of the file. 456 457``test-suite`` Overview 458======================= 459 460The ``test-suite`` module contains a number of programs that can be 461compiled and executed. The ``test-suite`` includes reference outputs for 462all of the programs, so that the output of the executed program can be 463checked for correctness. 464 465``test-suite`` tests are divided into three types of tests: MultiSource, 466SingleSource, and External. 467 468- ``test-suite/SingleSource`` 469 470 The SingleSource directory contains test programs that are only a 471 single source file in size. These are usually small benchmark 472 programs or small programs that calculate a particular value. Several 473 such programs are grouped together in each directory. 474 475- ``test-suite/MultiSource`` 476 477 The MultiSource directory contains subdirectories which contain 478 entire programs with multiple source files. Large benchmarks and 479 whole applications go here. 480 481- ``test-suite/External`` 482 483 The External directory contains Makefiles for building code that is 484 external to (i.e., not distributed with) LLVM. The most prominent 485 members of this directory are the SPEC 95 and SPEC 2000 benchmark 486 suites. The ``External`` directory does not contain these actual 487 tests, but only the Makefiles that know how to properly compile these 488 programs from somewhere else. When using ``LNT``, use the 489 ``--test-externals`` option to include these tests in the results. 490 491.. _test-suite-quickstart: 492 493``test-suite`` Quickstart 494------------------------- 495 496The modern way of running the ``test-suite`` is focused on testing and 497benchmarking complete compilers using the 498`LNT <http://llvm.org/docs/lnt>`_ testing infrastructure. 499 500For more information on using LNT to execute the ``test-suite``, please 501see the `LNT Quickstart <http://llvm.org/docs/lnt/quickstart.html>`_ 502documentation. 503 504``test-suite`` Makefiles 505------------------------ 506 507Historically, the ``test-suite`` was executed using a complicated setup 508of Makefiles. The LNT based approach above is recommended for most 509users, but there are some testing scenarios which are not supported by 510the LNT approach. In addition, LNT currently uses the Makefile setup 511under the covers and so developers who are interested in how LNT works 512under the hood may want to understand the Makefile based setup. 513 514For more information on the ``test-suite`` Makefile setup, please see 515the :doc:`Test Suite Makefile Guide <TestSuiteMakefileGuide>`. 516