1; RUN: llc -march=x86 -o - < %s | FileCheck %s 2 3; This used to be classified as a tail call because of a mismatch in the 4; arguments seen by Analysis.cpp and ISelLowering. As seen by ISelLowering, they 5; both return {i32, i32, i32} (since i64 is illegal) which is fine for a tail 6; call. 7 8; As seen by Analysis.cpp: i64 -> i32 is a valid trunc, second i32 passes 9; straight through and the third is undef, also OK for a tail call. 10 11; Analysis.cpp was wrong. 12 13; FIXME: in principle we *could* support some tail calls involving truncations 14; of illegal types: a single "trunc i64 %whatever to i32" is probably valid 15; because of how the extra registers are laid out. 16 17declare {i64, i32} @test() 18 19define {i32, i32, i32} @test_pair_notail(i64 %in) { 20; CHECK-LABEL: test_pair_notail 21; CHECK-NOT: jmp 22 23 %whole = tail call {i64, i32} @test() 24 %first = extractvalue {i64, i32} %whole, 0 25 %first.trunc = trunc i64 %first to i32 26 27 %second = extractvalue {i64, i32} %whole, 1 28 29 %tmp = insertvalue {i32, i32, i32} undef, i32 %first.trunc, 0 30 %res = insertvalue {i32, i32, i32} %tmp, i32 %second, 1 31 ret {i32, i32, i32} %res 32} 33