Searched refs:positive (Results 1 – 25 of 31) sorted by relevance
12
/ndk/tests/device/test-stlport/unit/ |
D | bcompos_test.cpp | 38 binary_compose<logical_and<bool>, odd, positive> in bcompos1() 39 b = binary_compose<logical_and<bool>, odd, positive>(logical_and<bool>(), odd(), positive()); in bcompos1() 52 compose2(logical_and<bool>(), odd(), positive())); in bcompos2()
|
D | unary.h | 15 struct positive : public unary_function<int, bool> { struct
|
/ndk/tests/device/test-gnustl-full/unit/ |
D | bcompos_test.cpp | 38 binary_compose<logical_and<bool>, odd, positive> in bcompos1() 39 b = binary_compose<logical_and<bool>, odd, positive>(logical_and<bool>(), odd(), positive()); in bcompos1() 52 compose2(logical_and<bool>(), odd(), positive())); in bcompos2()
|
D | unary.h | 15 struct positive : public unary_function<int, bool> { struct
|
/ndk/sources/third_party/googletest/googletest/src/ |
D | gtest.cc | 484 std::string positive; in FilterMatchesTest() local 487 positive = GTEST_FLAG(filter).c_str(); // Whole string is a positive filter in FilterMatchesTest() 490 positive = std::string(p, dash); // Everything up to the dash in FilterMatchesTest() 492 if (positive.empty()) { in FilterMatchesTest() 494 positive = kUniversalFilter; in FilterMatchesTest() 500 return (MatchesFilter(full_name, positive.c_str()) && in FilterMatchesTest()
|
/ndk/sources/cxx-stl/llvm-libc++/libcxx/include/ |
D | chrono | 45 static_assert(Period::num > 0, "duration period must be positive"); 411 static_assert(_Period::num > 0, "duration period must be positive");
|
/ndk/sources/host-tools/make-3.81/po/ |
D | de.po | 1124 msgstr "Die Option �-%c� verlangt eine positive ganze Zahl als Argument" 1128 msgid "the `-%c' option requires a positive integral argument" 1129 msgstr "Die Option �-%c� verlangt eine positive ganze Zahl als Argument" 2133 #~ msgid "the `word' function takes a positive index argument"
|
D | ja.po | 1091 msgid "the `-%c' option requires a positive integral argument" 2019 #~ msgid "the `word' function takes a positive index argument"
|
D | id.po | 1074 msgid "the `-%c' option requires a positive integral argument" 1996 #~ msgid "the `word' function takes a positive index argument"
|
D | pt_BR.po | 1095 msgid "the `-%c' option requires a positive integral argument" 2027 #~ msgid "the `word' function takes a positive index argument"
|
D | gl.po | 1109 msgid "the `-%c' option requires a positive integral argument" 2098 #~ msgid "the `word' function takes a positive index argument"
|
D | make.pot | 1033 msgid "the `-%c' option requires a positive integral argument"
|
D | be.po | 1044 msgid "the `-%c' option requires a positive integral argument"
|
D | zh_CN.po | 1056 msgid "the `-%c' option requires a positive integral argument"
|
D | ko.po | 1076 msgid "the `-%c' option requires a positive integral argument"
|
D | he.po | 1074 msgid "the `-%c' option requires a positive integral argument"
|
D | rw.po | 1132 msgid "the `-%c' option requires a positive integral argument"
|
D | nl.po | 1106 msgid "the `-%c' option requires a positive integral argument"
|
D | pl.po | 1100 msgid "the `-%c' option requires a positive integral argument"
|
D | da.po | 1087 msgid "the `-%c' option requires a positive integral argument"
|
/ndk/sources/host-tools/sed-4.2.1/testsuite/ |
D | uniq.good | 321 commoning these up that doesn't require a test of the positive/negative 346 current high water mark for use by positive assertions. Do this also
|
D | uniq.inp | 831 commoning these up that doesn't require a test of the positive/negative 876 current high water mark for use by positive assertions. Do this also
|
/ndk/sources/host-tools/sed-4.2.1/doc/ |
D | sed.texi | 3842 changed. Lookahead assertions start with @code{(?=} for positive 3873 Lookbehind assertions start with @code{(?<=} for positive 3975 for positive assertions, because it does not make sense for 4161 assertion. This may be a positive or negative lookahead or 4172 The condition is a positive lookahead assertion that matches
|
D | sed-in.texi | 3675 changed. Lookahead assertions start with @code{(?=} for positive 3706 Lookbehind assertions start with @code{(?<=} for positive 3808 for positive assertions, because it does not make sense for 3994 assertion. This may be a positive or negative lookahead or 4005 The condition is a positive lookahead assertion that matches
|
/ndk/sources/host-tools/nawk-20071023/ |
D | FIXES | 795 changed x^y so that if n is a positive integer, it's done
|
12