• Home
  • Line#
  • Scopes#
  • Navigate#
  • Raw
  • Download
1-------------------------------------------------------------------------
2drawElements Quality Program Test Specification
3-----------------------------------------------
4
5Copyright 2014 The Android Open Source Project
6
7Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
8you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
9You may obtain a copy of the License at
10
11     http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
12
13Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
14distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
15WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
16See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
17limitations under the License.
18-------------------------------------------------------------------------
19    Shader operator performance tests
20
21Tests:
22 + dEQP-GLES2.performance.shaders.operator.*
23
24Includes:
25 + Arithmetic operators in vertex and fragment shaders
26   - Scalar and vector types
27 + Computation-only built-in functions
28
29Excludes:
30 + Texture lookup built-in functions
31   - Covered in performance.texture.
32
33Description:
34
35Each test case draws multiple times with different workload sizes. A workload
36size means the iteration count of a uniform loop in the shader. Time for each
37frame is measured, and the slope of the workload size vs frame time data is
38estimated. This slope tells us the estimated increase in frame time caused by
39a workload increase of 1 loop iteration.
40
41Generally, the shaders contain not just the operation we're interested in (e.g.
42addition) but also some other things (e.g. loop overhead). To eliminate this
43cost, we actually do the measurements described above paragraph with two
44programs, which contain different amounts of computation in the loop. Then we
45can compute the cost of just one operation by appropriately subtracting the
46estimated slopes, and dividing by the operation count difference between the
47two programs.
48
49At this point, the result tells us the increase in frame time caused by the
50addition of one operation. Dividing this by the amount of draw calls in a frame,
51and further by the amount of vertices or fragments in a draw call, we get the
52time cost of one operation.
53
54In reality, there sometimes isn't just a trivial linear dependence between
55workload size and frame time. Instead, there tends to be some amount of initial
56"free" operations. That is, it may be that all workload sizes below some number
57C yield the same frame time, and only workload sizes beyond C increase the frame
58time in a supposedly linear manner. Graphically, this means that there graph
59consists of two parts: a horizontal left part, and a linearly increasing right
60part; the right part starts where the left parts ends. The principal task of
61these tests is to look at the slope of the increasing right part. Additionally
62an estimate for the amount of initial free operations is calculated. Note that
63it is also normal to get graphs where the horizontal left part is of zero width,
64i.e. there are no free operations.
65
66Note that the tests use several fixed constants, such as the extent to which the
67loops in the shaders are unrolled. These may not be the most suitable for all
68platforms, and can be modified near the top of es2pShaderOperatorTests.cpp .
69
70The unit of the test result is millions of operations per second.
71
72See performance.txt for more details on shader performance testing.
73