• Home
  • Line#
  • Scopes#
  • Navigate#
  • Raw
  • Download
1=================================
2How To Release LLVM To The Public
3=================================
4
5.. contents::
6   :local:
7   :depth: 1
8
9Introduction
10============
11
12This document contains information about successfully releasing LLVM ---
13including subprojects: e.g., ``clang`` and ``dragonegg`` --- to the public.  It
14is the Release Manager's responsibility to ensure that a high quality build of
15LLVM is released.
16
17If you're looking for the document on how to test the release candidates and
18create the binary packages, please refer to the :doc:`ReleaseProcess` instead.
19
20.. _timeline:
21
22Release Timeline
23================
24
25LLVM is released on a time based schedule --- with major releases roughly
26every 6 months.  In between major releases there may be dot releases.
27The release manager will determine if and when to make a dot release based
28on feedback from the community.  Typically, dot releases should be made if
29there are large number of bug-fixes in the stable branch or a critical bug
30has been discovered that affects a large number of users.
31
32Unless otherwise stated, dot releases will follow the same procedure as
33major releases.
34
35The release process is roughly as follows:
36
37* Set code freeze and branch creation date for 6 months after last code freeze
38  date.  Announce release schedule to the LLVM community and update the website.
39
40* Create release branch and begin release process.
41
42* Send out release candidate sources for first round of testing.  Testing lasts
43  7-10 days.  During the first round of testing, any regressions found should be
44  fixed.  Patches are merged from mainline into the release branch.  Also, all
45  features need to be completed during this time.  Any features not completed at
46  the end of the first round of testing will be removed or disabled for the
47  release.
48
49* Generate and send out the second release candidate sources.  Only *critial*
50  bugs found during this testing phase will be fixed.  Any bugs introduced by
51  merged patches will be fixed.  If so a third round of testing is needed.
52
53* The release notes are updated.
54
55* Finally, release!
56
57The release process will be accelerated for dot releases.  If the first round
58of testing finds no critical bugs and no regressions since the last major release,
59then additional rounds of testing will not be required.
60
61Release Process
62===============
63
64.. contents::
65   :local:
66
67Release Administrative Tasks
68----------------------------
69
70This section describes a few administrative tasks that need to be done for the
71release process to begin.  Specifically, it involves:
72
73* Creating the release branch,
74
75* Setting version numbers, and
76
77* Tagging release candidates for the release team to begin testing.
78
79Create Release Branch
80^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
81
82Branch the Subversion trunk using the following procedure:
83
84#. Remind developers that the release branching is imminent and to refrain from
85   committing patches that might break the build.  E.g., new features, large
86   patches for works in progress, an overhaul of the type system, an exciting
87   new TableGen feature, etc.
88
89#. Verify that the current Subversion trunk is in decent shape by
90   examining nightly tester and buildbot results.
91
92#. Create the release branch for ``llvm``, ``clang``, the ``test-suite``, and
93   ``dragonegg`` from the last known good revision.  The branch's name is
94   ``release_XY``, where ``X`` is the major and ``Y`` the minor release
95   numbers.  The branches should be created using the following commands:
96
97   ::
98
99     $ svn copy https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk \
100                https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/branches/release_XY
101
102     $ svn copy https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk \
103                https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/branches/release_XY
104
105     $ svn copy https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/dragonegg/trunk \
106                https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/dragonegg/branches/release_XY
107
108     $ svn copy https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/test-suite/trunk \
109                https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/test-suite/branches/release_XY
110
111#. Advise developers that they may now check their patches into the Subversion
112   tree again.
113
114#. The Release Manager should switch to the release branch, because all changes
115   to the release will now be done in the branch.  The easiest way to do this is
116   to grab a working copy using the following commands:
117
118   ::
119
120     $ svn co https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/branches/release_XY llvm-X.Y
121
122     $ svn co https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/branches/release_XY clang-X.Y
123
124     $ svn co https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/dragonegg/branches/release_XY dragonegg-X.Y
125
126     $ svn co https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/test-suite/branches/release_XY test-suite-X.Y
127
128Update LLVM Version
129^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
130
131After creating the LLVM release branch, update the release branches'
132``autoconf`` and ``configure.ac`` versions from '``X.Ysvn``' to '``X.Y``'.
133Update it on mainline as well to be the next version ('``X.Y+1svn``').
134Regenerate the configure scripts for both ``llvm`` and the ``test-suite``.
135
136In addition, the version numbers of all the Bugzilla components must be updated
137for the next release.
138
139Tagging the LLVM Release Candidates
140^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
141
142Tag release candidates using the tag.sh script in utils/release.
143
144::
145
146  $ ./tag.sh -release X.Y.Z -rc $RC
147
148The Release Manager may supply pre-packaged source tarballs for users.  This can
149be done with the export.sh script in utils/release.
150
151::
152
153  $ ./export.sh -release X.Y.Z -rc $RC
154
155This will generate source tarballs for each LLVM project being validated, which
156can be uploaded to the website for further testing.
157
158Building the Release
159--------------------
160
161The builds of ``llvm``, ``clang``, and ``dragonegg`` *must* be free of
162errors and warnings in Debug, Release+Asserts, and Release builds.  If all
163builds are clean, then the release passes Build Qualification.
164
165The ``make`` options for building the different modes:
166
167+-----------------+---------------------------------------------+
168| Mode            | Options                                     |
169+=================+=============================================+
170| Debug           | ``ENABLE_OPTIMIZED=0``                      |
171+-----------------+---------------------------------------------+
172| Release+Asserts | ``ENABLE_OPTIMIZED=1``                      |
173+-----------------+---------------------------------------------+
174| Release         | ``ENABLE_OPTIMIZED=1 DISABLE_ASSERTIONS=1`` |
175+-----------------+---------------------------------------------+
176
177Build LLVM
178^^^^^^^^^^
179
180Build ``Debug``, ``Release+Asserts``, and ``Release`` versions
181of ``llvm`` on all supported platforms.  Directions to build ``llvm``
182are :doc:`here <GettingStarted>`.
183
184Build Clang Binary Distribution
185^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
186
187Creating the ``clang`` binary distribution (Debug/Release+Asserts/Release)
188requires performing the following steps for each supported platform:
189
190#. Build clang according to the directions `here
191   <http://clang.llvm.org/get_started.html>`__.
192
193#. Build both a Debug and Release version of clang.  The binary will be the
194   Release build.
195
196#. Package ``clang`` (details to follow).
197
198Target Specific Build Details
199^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
200
201The table below specifies which compilers are used for each Arch/OS combination
202when qualifying the build of ``llvm``, ``clang``, and ``dragonegg``.
203
204+--------------+---------------+----------------------+
205| Architecture | OS            | compiler             |
206+==============+===============+======================+
207| x86-32       | Mac OS 10.5   | gcc 4.0.1            |
208+--------------+---------------+----------------------+
209| x86-32       | Linux         | gcc 4.2.X, gcc 4.3.X |
210+--------------+---------------+----------------------+
211| x86-32       | FreeBSD       | gcc 4.2.X            |
212+--------------+---------------+----------------------+
213| x86-32       | mingw         | gcc 3.4.5            |
214+--------------+---------------+----------------------+
215| x86-64       | Mac OS 10.5   | gcc 4.0.1            |
216+--------------+---------------+----------------------+
217| x86-64       | Linux         | gcc 4.2.X, gcc 4.3.X |
218+--------------+---------------+----------------------+
219| x86-64       | FreeBSD       | gcc 4.2.X            |
220+--------------+---------------+----------------------+
221| ARMv7        | Linux         | gcc 4.6.X, gcc 4.7.X |
222+--------------+---------------+----------------------+
223
224Release Qualification Criteria
225------------------------------
226
227A release is qualified when it has no regressions from the previous release (or
228baseline).  Regressions are related to correctness first and performance second.
229(We may tolerate some minor performance regressions if they are deemed
230necessary for the general quality of the compiler.)
231
232**Regressions are new failures in the set of tests that are used to qualify
233each product and only include things on the list.  Every release will have
234some bugs in it.  It is the reality of developing a complex piece of
235software.  We need a very concrete and definitive release criteria that
236ensures we have monotonically improving quality on some metric.  The metric we
237use is described below.  This doesn't mean that we don't care about other
238criteria, but these are the criteria which we found to be most important and
239which must be satisfied before a release can go out.**
240
241Qualify LLVM
242^^^^^^^^^^^^
243
244LLVM is qualified when it has a clean test run without a front-end.  And it has
245no regressions when using either ``clang`` or ``dragonegg`` with the
246``test-suite`` from the previous release.
247
248Qualify Clang
249^^^^^^^^^^^^^
250
251``Clang`` is qualified when front-end specific tests in the ``llvm`` regression
252test suite all pass, clang's own test suite passes cleanly, and there are no
253regressions in the ``test-suite``.
254
255Specific Target Qualification Details
256^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
257
258+--------------+-------------+----------------+-----------------------------+
259| Architecture | OS          | clang baseline | tests                       |
260+==============+=============+================+=============================+
261| x86-32       | Linux       | last release   | llvm regression tests,      |
262|              |             |                | clang regression tests,     |
263|              |             |                | test-suite (including spec) |
264+--------------+-------------+----------------+-----------------------------+
265| x86-32       | FreeBSD     | last release   | llvm regression tests,      |
266|              |             |                | clang regression tests,     |
267|              |             |                | test-suite                  |
268+--------------+-------------+----------------+-----------------------------+
269| x86-32       | mingw       | none           | QT                          |
270+--------------+-------------+----------------+-----------------------------+
271| x86-64       | Mac OS 10.X | last release   | llvm regression tests,      |
272|              |             |                | clang regression tests,     |
273|              |             |                | test-suite (including spec) |
274+--------------+-------------+----------------+-----------------------------+
275| x86-64       | Linux       | last release   | llvm regression tests,      |
276|              |             |                | clang regression tests,     |
277|              |             |                | test-suite (including spec) |
278+--------------+-------------+----------------+-----------------------------+
279| x86-64       | FreeBSD     | last release   | llvm regression tests,      |
280|              |             |                | clang regression tests,     |
281|              |             |                | test-suite                  |
282+--------------+-------------+----------------+-----------------------------+
283| ARMv7A       | Linux       | last release   | llvm regression tests,      |
284|              |             |                | clang regression tests,     |
285|              |             |                | test-suite                  |
286+--------------+-------------+----------------+-----------------------------+
287
288Community Testing
289-----------------
290
291Once all testing has been completed and appropriate bugs filed, the release
292candidate tarballs are put on the website and the LLVM community is notified.
293Ask that all LLVM developers test the release in 2 ways:
294
295#. Download ``llvm-X.Y``, ``llvm-test-X.Y``, and the appropriate ``clang``
296   binary.  Build LLVM.  Run ``make check`` and the full LLVM test suite (``make
297   TEST=nightly report``).
298
299#. Download ``llvm-X.Y``, ``llvm-test-X.Y``, and the ``clang`` sources.  Compile
300   everything.  Run ``make check`` and the full LLVM test suite (``make
301   TEST=nightly report``).
302
303Ask LLVM developers to submit the test suite report and ``make check`` results
304to the list.  Verify that there are no regressions from the previous release.
305The results are not used to qualify a release, but to spot other potential
306problems.  For unsupported targets, verify that ``make check`` is at least
307clean.
308
309During the first round of testing, all regressions must be fixed before the
310second release candidate is tagged.
311
312If this is the second round of testing, the testing is only to ensure that bug
313fixes previously merged in have not created new major problems. *This is not
314the time to solve additional and unrelated bugs!* If no patches are merged in,
315the release is determined to be ready and the release manager may move onto the
316next stage.
317
318Release Patch Rules
319-------------------
320
321Below are the rules regarding patching the release branch:
322
323#. Patches applied to the release branch may only be applied by the release
324   manager.
325
326#. During the first round of testing, patches that fix regressions or that are
327   small and relatively risk free (verified by the appropriate code owner) are
328   applied to the branch.  Code owners are asked to be very conservative in
329   approving patches for the branch.  We reserve the right to reject any patch
330   that does not fix a regression as previously defined.
331
332#. During the remaining rounds of testing, only patches that fix critical
333   regressions may be applied.
334
335#. For dot releases all patches must mantain both API and ABI compatibility with
336   the previous major release.  Only bugfixes will be accepted.
337
338Release Final Tasks
339-------------------
340
341The final stages of the release process involves tagging the "final" release
342branch, updating documentation that refers to the release, and updating the
343demo page.
344
345Update Documentation
346^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
347
348Review the documentation and ensure that it is up to date.  The "Release Notes"
349must be updated to reflect new features, bug fixes, new known issues, and
350changes in the list of supported platforms.  The "Getting Started Guide" should
351be updated to reflect the new release version number tag available from
352Subversion and changes in basic system requirements.  Merge both changes from
353mainline into the release branch.
354
355.. _tag:
356
357Tag the LLVM Final Release
358^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
359
360Tag the final release sources using the tag.sh script in utils/release.
361
362::
363
364  $ ./tag.sh -release X.Y.Z -final
365
366Update the LLVM Demo Page
367-------------------------
368
369The LLVM demo page must be updated to use the new release.  This consists of
370using the new ``clang`` binary and building LLVM.
371
372Update the LLVM Website
373^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
374
375The website must be updated before the release announcement is sent out.  Here
376is what to do:
377
378#. Check out the ``www`` module from Subversion.
379
380#. Create a new subdirectory ``X.Y`` in the releases directory.
381
382#. Commit the ``llvm``, ``test-suite``, ``clang`` source, ``clang binaries``,
383   ``dragonegg`` source, and ``dragonegg`` binaries in this new directory.
384
385#. Copy and commit the ``llvm/docs`` and ``LICENSE.txt`` files into this new
386   directory.  The docs should be built with ``BUILD_FOR_WEBSITE=1``.
387
388#. Commit the ``index.html`` to the ``release/X.Y`` directory to redirect (use
389   from previous release).
390
391#. Update the ``releases/download.html`` file with the new release.
392
393#. Update the ``releases/index.html`` with the new release and link to release
394   documentation.
395
396#. Finally, update the main page (``index.html`` and sidebar) to point to the
397   new release and release announcement.  Make sure this all gets committed back
398   into Subversion.
399
400Announce the Release
401^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
402
403Have Chris send out the release announcement when everything is finished.
404
405