• Home
  • Line#
  • Scopes#
  • Navigate#
  • Raw
  • Download
1 /*
2  * Copyright (C) 2009 The JSR-330 Expert Group
3  *
4  * Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
5  * you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
6  * You may obtain a copy of the License at
7  *
8  *      http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
9  *
10  * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
11  * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
12  * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
13  * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
14  * limitations under the License.
15  */
16 
17 /**
18  * This package specifies a means for obtaining objects in such a way as to
19  * maximize reusability, testability and maintainability compared to
20  * traditional approaches such as constructors, factories, and service
21  * locators (e.g., JNDI).&nbsp;This process, known as <i>dependency
22  * injection</i>, is beneficial to most nontrivial applications.
23  *
24  * <p>Many types depend on other types. For example, a <tt>Stopwatch</tt> might
25  * depend on a <tt>TimeSource</tt>. The types on which a type depends are
26  * known as its <i>dependencies</i>. The process of finding an instance of a
27  * dependency to use at run time is known as <i>resolving</i> the dependency.
28  * If no such instance can be found, the dependency is said to be
29  * <i>unsatisfied</i>, and the application is broken.
30  *
31  * <p>In the absence of dependency injection, an object can resolve its
32  * dependencies in a few ways. It can invoke a constructor, hard-wiring an
33  * object directly to its dependency's implementation and life cycle:
34  *
35  * <pre>   class Stopwatch {
36  *     final TimeSource timeSource;
37  *     Stopwatch () {
38  *       timeSource = <b>new AtomicClock(...)</b>;
39  *     }
40  *     void start() { ... }
41  *     long stop() { ... }
42  *   }</pre>
43  *
44  * <p>If more flexibility is needed, the object can call out to a factory or
45  * service locator:
46  *
47  * <pre>   class Stopwatch {
48  *     final TimeSource timeSource;
49  *     Stopwatch () {
50  *       timeSource = <b>DefaultTimeSource.getInstance()</b>;
51  *     }
52  *     void start() { ... }
53  *     long stop() { ... }
54  *   }</pre>
55  *
56  * <p>In deciding between these traditional approaches to dependency
57  * resolution, a programmer must make trade-offs. Constructors are more
58  * concise but restrictive. Factories decouple the client and implementation
59  * to some extent but require boilerplate code. Service locators decouple even
60  * further but reduce compile time type safety. All three approaches inhibit
61  * unit testing. For example, if the programmer uses a factory, each test
62  * against code that depends on the factory will have to mock out the factory
63  * and remember to clean up after itself or else risk side effects:
64  *
65  * <pre>   void testStopwatch() {
66  *     <b>TimeSource original = DefaultTimeSource.getInstance();
67  *     DefaultTimeSource.setInstance(new MockTimeSource());
68  *     try {</b>
69  *       // Now, we can actually test Stopwatch.
70  *       Stopwatch sw = new Stopwatch();
71  *       ...
72  *     <b>} finally {
73  *       DefaultTimeSource.setInstance(original);
74  *     }</b>
75  *   }</pre>
76  *
77  * <p>In practice, supporting this ability to mock out a factory results in
78  * even more boilerplate code. Tests that mock out and clean up after multiple
79  * dependencies quickly get out of hand. To make matters worse, a programmer
80  * must predict accurately how much flexibility will be needed in the future
81  * or else suffer the consequences. If a programmer initially elects to use a
82  * constructor but later decides that more flexibility is required, the
83  * programmer must replace every call to the constructor. If the programmer
84  * errs on the side of caution and write factories up front, it may result in
85  * a lot of unnecessary boilerplate code, adding noise, complexity, and
86  * error-proneness.
87  *
88  * <p><i>Dependency injection</i> addresses all of these issues. Instead of
89  * the programmer calling a constructor or factory, a tool called a
90  * <i>dependency injector</i> passes dependencies to objects:
91  *
92  * <pre>   class Stopwatch {
93  *     final TimeSource timeSource;
94  *     <b>@Inject Stopwatch(TimeSource timeSource)</b> {
95  *       this.timeSource = timeSource;
96  *     }
97  *     void start() { ... }
98  *     long stop() { ... }
99  *   }</pre>
100  *
101  * <p>The injector further passes dependencies to other dependencies until it
102  * constructs the entire object graph. For example, suppose the programmer
103  * asked an injector to create a <tt>StopwatchWidget</tt> instance:
104  *
105  * <pre>   /** GUI for a Stopwatch &#42;/
106  *   class StopwatchWidget {
107  *     &#64;Inject StopwatchWidget(Stopwatch sw) { ... }
108  *     ...
109  *   }</pre>
110  *
111  * <p>The injector might:
112  * <ol>
113  *   <li>Find a <tt>TimeSource</tt>
114  *   <li>Construct a <tt>Stopwatch</tt> with the <tt>TimeSource</tt>
115  *   <li>Construct a <tt>StopwatchWidget</tt> with the <tt>Stopwatch</tt>
116  * </ol>
117  *
118  * <p>This leaves the programmer's code clean, flexible, and relatively free
119  * of dependency-related infrastructure.
120  *
121  * <p>In unit tests, the programmer can now construct objects directly
122  * (without an injector) and pass in mock dependencies. The programmer no
123  * longer needs to set up and tear down factories or service locators in each
124  * test. This greatly simplifies our unit test:
125  *
126  * <pre>   void testStopwatch() {
127  *     Stopwatch sw = new Stopwatch(new MockTimeSource());
128  *     ...
129  *   }</pre>
130  *
131  * <p>The total decrease in unit-test complexity is proportional to the
132  * product of the number of unit tests and the number of dependencies.
133  *
134  * <p><b>This package provides dependency injection annotations that enable
135  * portable classes</b>, but it leaves external dependency configuration up to
136  * the injector implementation. Programmers annotate constructors, methods,
137  * and fields to advertise their injectability (constructor injection is
138  * demonstrated in the examples above). A dependency injector identifies a
139  * class's dependencies by inspecting these annotations, and injects the
140  * dependencies at run time. Moreover, the injector can verify that all
141  * dependencies have been satisfied at <i>build time</i>. A service locator,
142  * by contrast, cannot detect unsatisfied dependencies until run time.
143  *
144  * <p>Injector implementations can take many forms. An injector could
145  * configure itself using XML, annotations, a DSL (domain-specific language),
146  * or even plain Java code. An injector could rely on reflection or code
147  * generation. An injector that uses compile-time code generation may not even
148  * have its own run time representation. Other injectors may not be able to
149  * generate code at all, neither at compile nor run time. A "container", for
150  * some definition, can be an injector, but this package specification aims to
151  * minimize restrictions on injector implementations.
152  *
153  * @see javax.inject.Inject @Inject
154  */
155 package javax.inject;
156