1; RUN: opt -basicaa -print-memoryssa -verify-memoryssa -analyze < %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s 2; RUN: opt -aa-pipeline=basic-aa -passes='print<memoryssa>,verify<memoryssa>' -disable-output < %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s 3; 4; This test ensures we don't end up with multiple reaching defs for a single 5; use/phi edge If we were to optimize defs, we would end up with 2= 6; MemoryDef(liveOnEntry) and 4 = MemoryDef(liveOnEntry) Both would mean both 7; 1,2, and 3,4 would reach the phi node. Because the phi node can only have one 8; entry on each edge, it would choose 2, 4 and disconnect 1 and 3 completely 9; from the SSA graph, even though they are not dead 10 11define void @sink_store(i32 %index, i32* %foo, i32* %bar) { 12entry: 13 %cmp = trunc i32 %index to i1 14 br i1 %cmp, label %if.then, label %if.else 15 16if.then: ; preds = %entry 17; CHECK: 1 = MemoryDef(liveOnEntry) 18; CHECK-NEXT: store i32 %index, i32* %foo, align 4 19 store i32 %index, i32* %foo, align 4 20; CHECK: 2 = MemoryDef(1) 21; CHECK-NEXT: store i32 %index, i32* %bar, align 4 22 store i32 %index, i32* %bar, align 4 23 br label %if.end 24 25if.else: ; preds = %entry 26; CHECK: 3 = MemoryDef(liveOnEntry) 27; CHECK-NEXT: store i32 %index, i32* %foo, align 4 28 store i32 %index, i32* %foo, align 4 29; CHECK: 4 = MemoryDef(3) 30; CHECK-NEXT: store i32 %index, i32* %bar, align 4 31 store i32 %index, i32* %bar, align 4 32 br label %if.end 33 34if.end: ; preds = %if.else, %if.then 35; CHECK: 5 = MemoryPhi({if.then,2},{if.else,4}) 36; CHECK: MemoryUse(5) 37; CHECK-NEXT: %c = load i32, i32* %foo 38 %c = load i32, i32* %foo 39; CHECK: MemoryUse(5) 40; CHECK-NEXT: %d = load i32, i32* %bar 41 %d = load i32, i32* %bar 42 ret void 43} 44