1.. _page_migration: 2 3============== 4Page migration 5============== 6 7Page migration allows the moving of the physical location of pages between 8nodes in a numa system while the process is running. This means that the 9virtual addresses that the process sees do not change. However, the 10system rearranges the physical location of those pages. 11 12The main intend of page migration is to reduce the latency of memory access 13by moving pages near to the processor where the process accessing that memory 14is running. 15 16Page migration allows a process to manually relocate the node on which its 17pages are located through the MF_MOVE and MF_MOVE_ALL options while setting 18a new memory policy via mbind(). The pages of process can also be relocated 19from another process using the sys_migrate_pages() function call. The 20migrate_pages function call takes two sets of nodes and moves pages of a 21process that are located on the from nodes to the destination nodes. 22Page migration functions are provided by the numactl package by Andi Kleen 23(a version later than 0.9.3 is required. Get it from 24ftp://oss.sgi.com/www/projects/libnuma/download/). numactl provides libnuma 25which provides an interface similar to other numa functionality for page 26migration. cat ``/proc/<pid>/numa_maps`` allows an easy review of where the 27pages of a process are located. See also the numa_maps documentation in the 28proc(5) man page. 29 30Manual migration is useful if for example the scheduler has relocated 31a process to a processor on a distant node. A batch scheduler or an 32administrator may detect the situation and move the pages of the process 33nearer to the new processor. The kernel itself does only provide 34manual page migration support. Automatic page migration may be implemented 35through user space processes that move pages. A special function call 36"move_pages" allows the moving of individual pages within a process. 37A NUMA profiler may f.e. obtain a log showing frequent off node 38accesses and may use the result to move pages to more advantageous 39locations. 40 41Larger installations usually partition the system using cpusets into 42sections of nodes. Paul Jackson has equipped cpusets with the ability to 43move pages when a task is moved to another cpuset (See 44Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v1/cpusets.rst). 45Cpusets allows the automation of process locality. If a task is moved to 46a new cpuset then also all its pages are moved with it so that the 47performance of the process does not sink dramatically. Also the pages 48of processes in a cpuset are moved if the allowed memory nodes of a 49cpuset are changed. 50 51Page migration allows the preservation of the relative location of pages 52within a group of nodes for all migration techniques which will preserve a 53particular memory allocation pattern generated even after migrating a 54process. This is necessary in order to preserve the memory latencies. 55Processes will run with similar performance after migration. 56 57Page migration occurs in several steps. First a high level 58description for those trying to use migrate_pages() from the kernel 59(for userspace usage see the Andi Kleen's numactl package mentioned above) 60and then a low level description of how the low level details work. 61 62In kernel use of migrate_pages() 63================================ 64 651. Remove pages from the LRU. 66 67 Lists of pages to be migrated are generated by scanning over 68 pages and moving them into lists. This is done by 69 calling isolate_lru_page(). 70 Calling isolate_lru_page increases the references to the page 71 so that it cannot vanish while the page migration occurs. 72 It also prevents the swapper or other scans to encounter 73 the page. 74 752. We need to have a function of type new_page_t that can be 76 passed to migrate_pages(). This function should figure out 77 how to allocate the correct new page given the old page. 78 793. The migrate_pages() function is called which attempts 80 to do the migration. It will call the function to allocate 81 the new page for each page that is considered for 82 moving. 83 84How migrate_pages() works 85========================= 86 87migrate_pages() does several passes over its list of pages. A page is moved 88if all references to a page are removable at the time. The page has 89already been removed from the LRU via isolate_lru_page() and the refcount 90is increased so that the page cannot be freed while page migration occurs. 91 92Steps: 93 941. Lock the page to be migrated 95 962. Ensure that writeback is complete. 97 983. Lock the new page that we want to move to. It is locked so that accesses to 99 this (not yet uptodate) page immediately lock while the move is in progress. 100 1014. All the page table references to the page are converted to migration 102 entries. This decreases the mapcount of a page. If the resulting 103 mapcount is not zero then we do not migrate the page. All user space 104 processes that attempt to access the page will now wait on the page lock. 105 1065. The i_pages lock is taken. This will cause all processes trying 107 to access the page via the mapping to block on the spinlock. 108 1096. The refcount of the page is examined and we back out if references remain 110 otherwise we know that we are the only one referencing this page. 111 1127. The radix tree is checked and if it does not contain the pointer to this 113 page then we back out because someone else modified the radix tree. 114 1158. The new page is prepped with some settings from the old page so that 116 accesses to the new page will discover a page with the correct settings. 117 1189. The radix tree is changed to point to the new page. 119 12010. The reference count of the old page is dropped because the address space 121 reference is gone. A reference to the new page is established because 122 the new page is referenced by the address space. 123 12411. The i_pages lock is dropped. With that lookups in the mapping 125 become possible again. Processes will move from spinning on the lock 126 to sleeping on the locked new page. 127 12812. The page contents are copied to the new page. 129 13013. The remaining page flags are copied to the new page. 131 13214. The old page flags are cleared to indicate that the page does 133 not provide any information anymore. 134 13515. Queued up writeback on the new page is triggered. 136 13716. If migration entries were page then replace them with real ptes. Doing 138 so will enable access for user space processes not already waiting for 139 the page lock. 140 14119. The page locks are dropped from the old and new page. 142 Processes waiting on the page lock will redo their page faults 143 and will reach the new page. 144 14520. The new page is moved to the LRU and can be scanned by the swapper 146 etc again. 147 148Non-LRU page migration 149====================== 150 151Although original migration aimed for reducing the latency of memory access 152for NUMA, compaction who want to create high-order page is also main customer. 153 154Current problem of the implementation is that it is designed to migrate only 155*LRU* pages. However, there are potential non-lru pages which can be migrated 156in drivers, for example, zsmalloc, virtio-balloon pages. 157 158For virtio-balloon pages, some parts of migration code path have been hooked 159up and added virtio-balloon specific functions to intercept migration logics. 160It's too specific to a driver so other drivers who want to make their pages 161movable would have to add own specific hooks in migration path. 162 163To overclome the problem, VM supports non-LRU page migration which provides 164generic functions for non-LRU movable pages without driver specific hooks 165migration path. 166 167If a driver want to make own pages movable, it should define three functions 168which are function pointers of struct address_space_operations. 169 1701. ``bool (*isolate_page) (struct page *page, isolate_mode_t mode);`` 171 172 What VM expects on isolate_page function of driver is to return *true* 173 if driver isolates page successfully. On returing true, VM marks the page 174 as PG_isolated so concurrent isolation in several CPUs skip the page 175 for isolation. If a driver cannot isolate the page, it should return *false*. 176 177 Once page is successfully isolated, VM uses page.lru fields so driver 178 shouldn't expect to preserve values in that fields. 179 1802. ``int (*migratepage) (struct address_space *mapping,`` 181| ``struct page *newpage, struct page *oldpage, enum migrate_mode);`` 182 183 After isolation, VM calls migratepage of driver with isolated page. 184 The function of migratepage is to move content of the old page to new page 185 and set up fields of struct page newpage. Keep in mind that you should 186 indicate to the VM the oldpage is no longer movable via __ClearPageMovable() 187 under page_lock if you migrated the oldpage successfully and returns 188 MIGRATEPAGE_SUCCESS. If driver cannot migrate the page at the moment, driver 189 can return -EAGAIN. On -EAGAIN, VM will retry page migration in a short time 190 because VM interprets -EAGAIN as "temporal migration failure". On returning 191 any error except -EAGAIN, VM will give up the page migration without retrying 192 in this time. 193 194 Driver shouldn't touch page.lru field VM using in the functions. 195 1963. ``void (*putback_page)(struct page *);`` 197 198 If migration fails on isolated page, VM should return the isolated page 199 to the driver so VM calls driver's putback_page with migration failed page. 200 In this function, driver should put the isolated page back to the own data 201 structure. 202 2034. non-lru movable page flags 204 205 There are two page flags for supporting non-lru movable page. 206 207 * PG_movable 208 209 Driver should use the below function to make page movable under page_lock:: 210 211 void __SetPageMovable(struct page *page, struct address_space *mapping) 212 213 It needs argument of address_space for registering migration 214 family functions which will be called by VM. Exactly speaking, 215 PG_movable is not a real flag of struct page. Rather than, VM 216 reuses page->mapping's lower bits to represent it. 217 218:: 219 #define PAGE_MAPPING_MOVABLE 0x2 220 page->mapping = page->mapping | PAGE_MAPPING_MOVABLE; 221 222 so driver shouldn't access page->mapping directly. Instead, driver should 223 use page_mapping which mask off the low two bits of page->mapping under 224 page lock so it can get right struct address_space. 225 226 For testing of non-lru movable page, VM supports __PageMovable function. 227 However, it doesn't guarantee to identify non-lru movable page because 228 page->mapping field is unified with other variables in struct page. 229 As well, if driver releases the page after isolation by VM, page->mapping 230 doesn't have stable value although it has PAGE_MAPPING_MOVABLE 231 (Look at __ClearPageMovable). But __PageMovable is cheap to catch whether 232 page is LRU or non-lru movable once the page has been isolated. Because 233 LRU pages never can have PAGE_MAPPING_MOVABLE in page->mapping. It is also 234 good for just peeking to test non-lru movable pages before more expensive 235 checking with lock_page in pfn scanning to select victim. 236 237 For guaranteeing non-lru movable page, VM provides PageMovable function. 238 Unlike __PageMovable, PageMovable functions validates page->mapping and 239 mapping->a_ops->isolate_page under lock_page. The lock_page prevents sudden 240 destroying of page->mapping. 241 242 Driver using __SetPageMovable should clear the flag via __ClearMovablePage 243 under page_lock before the releasing the page. 244 245 * PG_isolated 246 247 To prevent concurrent isolation among several CPUs, VM marks isolated page 248 as PG_isolated under lock_page. So if a CPU encounters PG_isolated non-lru 249 movable page, it can skip it. Driver doesn't need to manipulate the flag 250 because VM will set/clear it automatically. Keep in mind that if driver 251 sees PG_isolated page, it means the page have been isolated by VM so it 252 shouldn't touch page.lru field. 253 PG_isolated is alias with PG_reclaim flag so driver shouldn't use the flag 254 for own purpose. 255 256Christoph Lameter, May 8, 2006. 257Minchan Kim, Mar 28, 2016. 258